Cited by 39Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisDisaster Management and ResilienceFire effects on ecosystems

Prediction of Water Distribution System Contamination Based on Wildfire Burn Severity in Wildland Urban Interface Communities

Schulze, Stefanie S., Fischer, Erica C.·2021·ACS ES&T Water

Abstract

The devastation to infrastructure in wildland urban interface (WUI) communities caused by wildfires has brought attention to the dramatic and unforeseen impacts of high fuel load density within these communities. In the past three years, above-ground structures have been damaged by wildfire and fire damage to underground water distribution system components has caused contamination of the drinking water in affected areas. To quantify the potential water contamination risks posed by wildfire hazards on WUI communities, the risk is assessed on the basis of burn severity. This study found that traditional methods of calculating burn severity using satellite imagery were not appropriate for classifying localized burn severity within WUI communities. Instead, local burn severity within WUI communities can be quantified by the density of damaged structures. This research uses water sampling data and results from the City of Santa Rosa and the Town of Paradise to develop fragility functions for estimating the probability of a water sample exceeding California maximum contaminant levels given the number of damaged structures surrounding the sample location. Results of this research will provide useful information for WUI water utilities regarding the implementation of mitigation strategies and location of vulnerabilities throughout their water distribution systems to minimize damage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsestwater.0c00073

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent analysis suggests that burn severity, as measured by the density of damaged structures, is correlated with the probability of VOC contamination exceeding maximum contaminant levels (MCLs).

    “A recent analysis suggests that burn severity, as measured by the density of damaged structures, is correlated with the probability of VOC contamination exceeding maximum contaminant levels (MCLs).11”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulze, S. S., & Fischer, E. C.
Affiliations
  • Catena consulting engineers
  • Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Schulze, Stefanie S.
Venue
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2020-11-16
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
291-299
ISSN
2690-0637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3103627275
Cited by
39
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS ES&T Water (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cascadia Lifelines Program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
wildfire burn severity, wildland-urban interface, water distribution systems, drinking water contamination, burn severity mapping, fragility curves, maximum contaminant levels, water utilities, wildfire risk assessment, Santa Rosa, paradise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review