The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of Amphipathicity and Hydrophobicity to the Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity of β-Hairpin Peptides
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Bacteria have acquired extensive resistance mechanisms to protect themselves against antibiotic action. Today the bacterial membrane has become one of the “final frontiers” in the search for new compounds acting on novel targets to address the threat of multi-drug resistant (MDR) and XDR bacterial pathogens. β-Hairpin antimicrobial peptides are amphipathic, membrane-binding antibiotics that exhibit a broad range of activities against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and fungal pathogens. However, most members of the class also possess adverse cytotoxicity and hemolytic activity that preclude their development as candidate antimicrobials. We examined peptide hydrophobicity, amphipathicity, and structure to better dissect and understand the correlation between antimicrobial activity and toxicity, membrane binding, and membrane permeability. The hydrophobicity, pI, net charge at physiological pH, and amphipathic moment for the β-hairpin antimicrobial peptides tachyplesin-1, polyphemusin-1, protegrin-1, gomesin, arenicin-3, and thanatin were determined and correlated with key antimicrobial activity and toxicity data. These included antimicrobial activity against five key bacterial pathogens and two fungi, cytotoxicity against human cell lines, and hemolytic activity in human erythrocytes. Observed antimicrobial activity trends correlated with compound amphipathicity and, to a lesser extent, with overall hydrophobicity. Antimicrobial activity increased with amphipathicity, but unfortunately so did toxicity. Of note, tachyplesin-1 was found to be 8-fold more amphipathic than gomesin. These analyses identify tachyplesin-1 as a promising scaffold for rational design and synthetic optimization toward an antibiotic candidate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
O'Brien, J., Wilson, I., Orton, T., & Pognan, F. (2000) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01606.x · Cited by 3,446
Antimicrobial peptides: promising compounds against pathogenic microorganisms
Cruz, J., Ortiz, C., Guzmán, F., Fernández-Lafuente, R., & Torres, R. (2014) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867321666140217110155 · Cited by 166
Cited by
Kumar, P., Kizhakkedathu, J., & Straus, S. (2018) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom8010004 · Cited by 1,227
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs): A promising class of antimicrobial compounds
Erdem Büyükkiraz, M., & Kesmen, Z. (2022) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.15314 · Cited by 454
Membrane targeting cationic antimicrobial peptides
Ciumac, D., Gong, H., Hu, X., & Lu, J. R. (2019) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.103 · Cited by 351
Cell penetrating peptide: A potent delivery system in vaccine development
Hasannejad-Asl, B., Pooresmaeil, F., Takamoli, S., Dabiri, M., & Bolhassani, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1072685 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, I. A., Elliott, A. G., Kavanagh, A. M., Zuegg, J., Blaskovich, M. A. T., & Cooper, M. A.
- Venue
- ACS Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-05-09
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 442-450
- ISSN
- 2373-8227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2345243989
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of Amphipathicity and Hydrophobicity to the Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity of β-Hairpin Peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00045
- The paper
- Edwards, I. A., Elliott, A. G., Kavanagh, A. M., Zuegg, J., Blaskovich, M. A. T., & Cooper, M. A. (2016). Contribution of Amphipathicity and Hydrophobicity to the Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity of β-Hairpin Peptides. ACS Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.