The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting the Valence and Conduction Band Size Dependence of PbS Quantum Dot Thin Films
Open accessAbstract
We use a high signal-to-noise X-ray photoelectron spectrum of bulk PbS, GW calculations, and a model assuming parabolic bands to unravel the various X-ray and ultraviolet photoelectron spectral features of bulk PbS as well as determine how to best analyze the valence band region of PbS quantum dot (QD) films. X-ray and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS and UPS) are commonly used to probe the difference between the Fermi level and valence band maximum (VBM) for crystalline and thin-film semiconductors. However, we find that when the standard XPS/UPS analysis is used for PbS, the results are often unrealistic due to the low density of states at the VBM. Instead, a parabolic band model is used to determine the VBM for the PbS QD films, which is based on the bulk PbS experimental spectrum and bulk GW calculations. Our analysis highlights the breakdown of the Brillioun zone representation of the band diagram for large band gap, highly quantum confined PbS QDs. We have also determined that in 1,2-ethanedithiol-treated PbS QD films the Fermi level position is dependent on the QD size; specifically, the smallest band gap QD films have the Fermi level near the conduction band minimum and the Fermi level moves away from the conduction band for larger band gap PbS QD films. This change in the Fermi level within the QD band gap could be due to changes in the Pb:S ratio. In addition, we use inverse photoelectron spectroscopy to measure the conduction band region, which has similar challenges in the analysis of PbS QD films due to a low density of states near the conduction band minimum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved performance and stability in quantum dot solar cells through band alignment engineering
Chuang, C.-H. M., Brown, P. R., Bulović, V., & Bawendi, M. G. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3984 · Cited by 1,795
Air-stable n-type colloidal quantum dot solids
Ning, Z., Voznyy, O., Pan, J., Hoogland, S., Adinolfi, V., Xu, J., Li, M., Kirmani, A. R., Sun, J.-P., Minor, J., et al. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4007 · Cited by 619
Cited by
Halide Perovskites: Is It All about the Interfaces?
Schulz, P., Cahen, D., & Kahn, A. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00558 · Cited by 558
Self-citationEndres, J., Egger, D. A., Kulbak, M., Kerner, R. A., Zhao, L., Silver, S. H., Hodes, G., Rand, B. P., Cahen, D., Kronik, L., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00946 · Cited by 451
Self-citationHighly stable QLEDs with improved hole injection via quantum dot structure tailoring
Cao, W., Xiang, C., Yang, Y., Chen, Q., Chen, L., Yan, X., & Qian, L. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04986-z · Cited by 388
What Remains Unexplained about the Properties of Halide Perovskites?
Egger, D. A., Bera, A., Cahen, D., Hodes, G., Kirchartz, T., Kronik, L., Lovrincic, R., Rappe, A. M., Reichman, D. R., & Yaffe, O. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201800691 · Cited by 293
Dong, C., Liu, S., Barange, N., Lee, J., Pardue, T., Yi, X., Yin, S., & So, F. (2019) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b16539 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, E. M., Kroupa, D. M., Zhang, J., Schulz, P., Marshall, A. R., Kahn, A., Lany, S., Luther, J. M., Beard, M. C., Perkins, C. L., & van de Lagemaat, J.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-02-26
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3302-3311
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2278931796
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.