Cited by 46Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen ReductionElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins

High-efficiency electrochemical ammonia synthesis at co-catalytic Fe–Mo dual-atom sites

Li, Ruonan, Ma, Runlin, Zhang, Li-Li, Ma, Wei, Shao, Gonglei, Zhang, Xu, Tian, Yun, Jiao, Menggai +1 more·2025·ACS Nano

Abstract

To tackle the challenge in electrochemical nitrogen fixing and reduction in aqueous electrolytes, the conventional approach has been to suppress the competitive hydrogen evolution reaction. Nonetheless, proton provision is a crucial step in the nitrogen reduction pathway to produce ammonia, and a single active site faces the daunting task in striking a balance between high nitrogen fixation efficiency and fast protonation kinetics. This work presents a harmonic strategy featuring atomically dispersed dual Fe–Mo sites anchored in an N-doped carbon (FeMoNC) substrate, where a low-spin Fe center with enriched empty d orbitals aids in nitrogen fixation and activation, and the adjacent Mo site accelerates the protonation kinetics of N-containing intermediates at the Fe site via a distal associative mechanism. Driven by this co-catalytic mechanism, the FeMoNC catalyst achieves a Faradaic efficiency of 37.42%, marking a significant improvement of 7.8- and 10.6-fold over Fe or Mo single-atom catalysts, respectively. Furthermore, an excellent NH 3 yield of 54.40 μg h –1 mg cat. –1 is realized in a flow cell by enhancing mass transfer. This study provides valuable insights into diatomic co-catalytic mechanisms for electrochemical ammonia synthesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsnano.5c01741

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, R., Ma, R., Zhang, L.-L., Ma, W., Shao, G., Zhang, X., Tian, Y., Jiao, M., & Zhou, Z.
Affiliations
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • Interdisciplinary Research Center for Sustainable Energy Science and Engineering (IRC4SE), School of Chemical Engineering
  • Nankai University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jiao, Menggai
  • Zhou, Zhen
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2025-05-05
Volume
19
Issue
18
Pages
17686-17697
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W4410096201
Cited by
46
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 14
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Key Scientific Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province (24A530009)
  • Zhengzhou University (JC23257011)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (22208322, U21A20281)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
Keywords
electrochemical nitrogen reduction, co-catalysis, nitrogen-doped carbon, protonation kinetics, hydrogen evolution suppression, Faradaic efficiency, mass transfer enhancement, flow cell

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review