Conversational Large-Language-Model Artificial Intelligence Agent for Accelerated Synthesis of Metal-Organic Frameworks Catalysts in Olefin Hydrogenation
Abstract
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) attract significant attention for their structural diversity and design flexibility, making them ideal candidates for catalytic applications. However, the traditional trial-and-error approach for optimizing MOF synthesis remains inefficient. In this study, we introduce the MOFsyn agent, an AI-driven framework that harnesses large language models (LLMs) for MOF synthesis optimization. This system integrates data automatic analysis, material mechanism analysis, and experimental protocol navigation by employing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to refine synthetic strategies based on natural language inputs. Using Ni@UiO-66(Ce) for olefin hydrogenation as a case study, the MOFsyn agent analyzed the relationship between synthesis conditions, structural characteristics, and catalytic performance, with a particular focus on the electronic structure of nickel. Through adaptive optimization, a novel stepwise reduction strategy was proposed that outperformed conventional one-pot reduction. The optimized Ni@UiO-66(Ce)-R2T1, synthesized under MOFsyn agent’s guidance, exhibited nearly twice the Ni 0 /Ni total ratio compared to the best-performing sample from an initial experimental set and achieved 100% conversion and selectivity for dicyclopentadiene hydrogenation under mild conditions (70 °C, 2 MPa). These results validate the accuracy and efficiency of the MOFsyn agent. This study provides an efficient tool for intelligent material synthesis, enabling researchers without programming expertise to accelerate material development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Catalysis and adsorption tasks formed the largest application block, represented by six studies on electrocatalyst design, adsorption-configuration search, biomass-valorization catalysis, MOF catalyst optimization, and single-atom-alloy discovery.
“Catalysis and adsorption tasks formed the largest application block, represented by six studies on electrocatalyst design, adsorption-configuration search, biomass-valorization catalysis, MOF catalyst optimization, and single-atom-alloy discovery [19,20,27,28,30,34].”
From From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
A second group of studies used hybrid human-in-the-loop designs, where the agentic layer guided design or analysis but final judgment remained partly manual.
“A second group of studies used hybrid human-in-the-loop designs, where the agentic layer guided design or analysis but final judgment remained partly manual [20,22,27,30,31].”
From From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
In several papers, the strongest reproducibility evidence came from public code, tutorials, datasets, or supplementary traces.
“In several papers, the strongest reproducibility evidence came from public code, tutorials, datasets, or supplementary traces [18-21,23,25,28,30,31,35-42].”
From From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Other studies act more as discovery managers around retrieval, ranking, surrogate models, or protocol navigation.
“Others act more as discovery managers around retrieval, ranking, surrogate models, or protocol navigation [19,20,26,30,41].”
From From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Hybrid human-in-the-loop systems accounted for four of the six experimentally validated papers, which suggests that human oversight appears to be retained more often where the downstream consequences of an incorrect decision are more costly or irreversible, although the small sample precludes strong inference.
“Hybrid human-in-the-loop systems accounted for four of the six experimentally validated papers, which suggests that human oversight appears to be retained more often where the downstream consequences of an incorrect decision are more costly or irreversible, although the small sample precludes strong inference [20,22,27,30,31].”
From From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
The Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks
Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O’Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230444 · Cited by 17,034 · see citing works
Introduction to Metal–Organic Frameworks
Zhou, H.-C. “., Long, J. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300014x · Cited by 7,754 · see citing works
Stock, N., & Biswas, S. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200304e · Cited by 5,055 · see citing works
The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond
Robertson, S., & Zaragoza, H. (2009) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000019 · Cited by 3,374 · see citing works
Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure
Altmann, A., Toloşi, L., Sander, O., & Lengauer, T. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134 · Cited by 2,903 · see citing works
Structured information extraction from scientific text with large language models
Dagdelen, J., Dunn, A., Lee, S., Walker, N., Rosen, A. S., Ceder, G., Persson, K. A., & Jain, A. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45563-x · Cited by 771 · see citing works
Lammert, M., Wharmby, M. T., Smolders, S., et al. (2015) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c5cc02606g · Cited by 599 · see citing works
ChatGPT Chemistry Assistant for Text Mining and the Prediction of MOF Synthesis
Zheng, Z.-L., Zhang, O.-F., Borgs, C., Chayes, J., & Yaghi, O. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.3c05819 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
25 Years of Reticular Chemistry
Freund, R., Canossa, S., Cohen, S. M., et al. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202101644 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Leveraging large language models for predictive chemistry
Jablonka, K. M., Schwaller, P., Ortega-Guerrero, A., & Smit, B. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00788-1 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Kang, Y., & Kim, J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48998-4 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
MOF Synthesis Prediction Enabled by Automatic Data Mining and Machine Learning**
Luo, Y., Bag, S., Zaremba, O. T., Cierpka, A., Andreo, J., Wuttke, S., Friederich, P., & Tsotsalas, M. M. (2022) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202200242 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Wang, H., Li, X., Lan, X., & Wang, T. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b03795 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Chen, S., Hai, G., Gao, H., Chen, X., Li, A., Zhang, X., & Dong, W. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126886 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationChatGPT Research Group for Optimizing the Crystallinity of MOFs and COFs
Zheng, Z., Zhang, O., Nguyen, H. L., Rampal, N., Alawadhi, A. H., Rong, Z., Head-Gordon, T., Borgs, C., Chayes, J. T., & Yaghi, O. M. (2023) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.3c01087 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
A GPT‐4 Reticular Chemist for Guiding MOF Discovery**
Zheng, Z., Rong, Z., Rampal, N., Borgs, C., Chayes, J., & Yaghi, O. M. (2023) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202311983 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Wang, J., Liu, J., Wang, H., Zhou, M., Ke, G., Zhang, L., Wu, J., Gao, Z., & Lu, D. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46276-x · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Fine-tuning large language models for chemical text mining
Zhang, W., Wang, Q., Kong, X., Xiong, J., Ni, S., Cao, D., Niu, B., Chen, M., Li, Y., Zhang, R., et al. (2024) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d4sc00924j · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Advances in data‐assisted high‐throughput computations for material design
Xu, D., Zhang, Q., Huo, X., Wang, Y., & Yang, M. (2023) · Materials Genome Engineering Advances · doi:10.1002/mgea.11 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Materials science in the era of large language models: a perspective
Lei, G., Docherty, R., & Cooper, S. J. (2024) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d4dd00074a · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Molecular Diversity and Representativity in Chemical Databases
Bayada, D. M., Hamersma, H., & van Geerestein, V. J. (1998) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci980109e · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Lin, J., Liu, Z., Guo, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, T., Xue, X., Li, R., Feng, S., Wang, L., Liu, J., et al. (2023) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2023.101802 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationLong, J., Yao, Q., Zhang, X., Wu, H., & Lu, Z. (2022) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121989 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Machine-Learning-Guided Morphology Engineering of Nanoscale Metal-Organic Frameworks
Chen, P., Tang, Z., Zeng, Z., et al. (2020) · Matter · doi:10.1016/j.matt.2020.04.021 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Li, C., Bao, L., Ji, Y., Tian, Z., Cui, M., Shi, Y., Zhao, Z., & Wang, X. (2024) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2024.215888 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationJiang, T., Liu, Z., Yuan, Y., Zheng, X., Park, S., Wei, S., Li, L., Ma, Y., Liu, S., Chen, J., et al. (2023) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202300502 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Prospects of materials genome engineering frontiers
Xie, J. (2023) · Materials Genome Engineering Advances · doi:10.1002/mgea.17 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Kumar, S., Muhammad, R., Amhamed, A. I., & Oh, H. (2024) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216230 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Sun, L., Pan, X., Xie, Y., et al. (2024) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202402176 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Zhuo, Y., Guo, X., Cai, W. H., et al. (2023) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122789 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Nickel-catalysed enantioselective hydrosulfenation of alkynes
Zhang, Y.-Q., Hu, L., Yuwen, L., et al. (2023) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-023-00966-9 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Hierarchically ordered meso-/macroporous MOF-based materials for catalysis and energy applications
Hu, A., Xie, Q., Chen, L., & Li, Y. (2024) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2024.100137 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Cui, X., Shyshkanov, S., Nguyen, T. N., et al. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202004618 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Li, R., Wang, L., Wang, L., et al. (2024) · CHINESE JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS (CHINESE VERSION) · doi:10.1016/s1872-2067(23)64562-0 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationLin, J., Ban, T., Li, T., Sun, Y., Zhou, S., Li, R., Su, Y., Kasemchainan, J., Gao, H., Shi, L., et al. (2024) · Materials Genome Engineering Advances · doi:10.1002/mgea.61 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationGuo, Q., Wang, Z., Feng, X., et al. (2023) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202306905 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment of high‐throughput wet‐chemical synthesis techniques for material research
Chen, Z., Lu, D., Cao, J., Zhao, F., Feng, G., Xu, C. G., Deng, Y., & Xiang, X. ‐. (2023) · Materials Genome Engineering Advances · doi:10.1002/mgea.5 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Li, R., Ban, T., Zhao, D., Lin, J., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Huang, X., Tao, Z., & Wang, G. (2024) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-024-6954-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationPawlak, T. P., & Krawiec, K. (2017) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/evco_a_00205 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Chafiq, M., Chaouiki, A., & Ko, Y. G. (2024) · Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials · doi:10.1007/s42114-024-01044-9 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Jia, C., Chen, X., Peng, W., Ma, Q., Zhang, D., Huang, Y., Li, G., Rezakazemi, M., & Huang, R. (2024) · Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials · doi:10.1007/s42114-024-01022-1 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Xu, G., Xue, Y., Geng, X., Hou, X., & Xu, J. (2024) · Materials Genome Engineering Advances · doi:10.1002/mgea.38 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Zhao, D., Hu, F., Li, R., et al. (2025) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-024-2430-7 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationYuan, Z., Wang, G., Li, X., et al. (2023) · Journal of Catalysis · doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2023.05.011 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge language models for biomolecular analysis: From methods to applications
Feng, R., Zhang, C., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2024.117540 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationPost-Pretraining Large Language Model Enabled Reverse Design of MOFs for Hydrogen StoragePreprint
Liu, Z. Y., Su, Y., Guo, Y., Lin, J. C., Wang, S., Song, Z., Xi, Z., Gao, H., Shi, L., & Wang, G. (2024) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-xz77q · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationHu, F., Li, R., Zhao, D., et al. (2025) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.163022 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alviz-Meza, A., Valencia-Arias, A., Rojas-Flores, S., & Diaz, F. (2026) · Data · doi:10.3390/data11070180
- Authors
- Lin, J., Zhao, D., Lu, S., Li, R., Xu, X., Wang, Z., Li, W., Ji, Y., Zhang, C., Shi, L., Jin, X., Gao, H., & Wang, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
- Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN)
- Beihang University (CN)
- Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development
- Corresponding author
- Gao, Hongyi
- Wang, Ge
- ORCID
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2025-06-24
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 23840-23858
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W4411572762
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 8
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFB3500700)
- State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems (VRLAB2025C11)
- Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (L233011)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (52373261)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
- Keywords
- metal-organic frameworks, olefin hydrogenation, nickel catalysts, UiO-66(Ce), retrieval-augmented generation, large language models, conversational AI agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review