Bioinspired, Highly Stretchable, and Conductive Dry Adhesives Based on 1D–2D Hybrid Carbon Nanocomposites for All-in-One ECG Electrodes
Abstract
Here we propose a concept of conductive dry adhesives (CDA) combining a gecko-inspired hierarchical structure and an elastomeric carbon nanocomposite. To complement the poor electrical percolation of 1D carbon nanotube (CNT) networks in an elastomeric matrix at a low filler content (∼1 wt %), a higher dimensional carbon material (i.e., carbon black, nanographite, and graphene nanopowder) is added into the mixture as an aid filler. The co-doped graphene and CNT in the composite show the lowest volume resistance (∼100 ohm·cm) at an optimized filler ratio (1:9, total filler content: 1 wt %) through a synergetic effect in electrical percolation. With an optimized conductive elastomer, gecko-inspired high-aspect-ratio (>3) microstructures over a large area (∼4 in.(2)) are successfully replicated from intaglio-patterned molds without collapse. The resultant CDA pad shows a high normal adhesion force (∼1.3 N/cm(2)) even on rough human skin and an excellent cycling property for repeatable use over 30 times without degradation of adhesion force, which cannot be achieved by commercial wet adhesives. The body-attachable CDA can be used as a metal-free, all-in-one component for measuring biosignals under daily activity conditions (i.e., underwater, movements) because of its superior conformality and water-repellent characteristic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nanomaterial-enabled dry electrodes have been demonstrated for wearable and long-term ECG sensing without irritating the skin.
“Nanomaterialenabled dry electrodes have been demonstrated for wearable and long-term ECG sensing without irritating the skin.[92,95,100]”
From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [100]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 474
- Authors
- Kim, T., Park, J., Sohn, J., Cho, D., & Jeon, S.
- Affiliations
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Jeon, Seokwoo
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-03-22
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4770-4778
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2298675569
- Semantic Scholar
- 2edf267654d80bb896d54514cd533beb927b24b7
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 23.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2014 M3A6B3063708)
- Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (B0101-15-0239)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
- Keywords
- carbon nanocomposites, carbon nanotubes, graphene nanopowder, carbon black, nanographite, rubber composites, electrical percolation, volume resistance, adhesion force, cycling stability, ECG electrodes, wearable electronics
- MeSH terms
- Adhesives, Elasticity, Electric Conductivity, Electrocardiography, Electrodes, Graphite, Humans, Particle Size, Skin, Surface Properties, Molecular Structure, Porosity, Elastomers, Nanotubes, Carbon, Nanocomposites, Electrochemical Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review