The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trends in Adhesion Energies of Metal Nanoparticles on Oxide Surfaces: Understanding Support Effects in Catalysis and Nanotechnology
Open accessAbstract
Nanoparticles on surfaces are ubiquitous in nanotechnologies, especially in catalysis, where metal nanoparticles anchored to oxide supports are widely used to produce and use fuels and chemicals, and in pollution abatement. We show that for hemispherical metal particles of the same diameter, D, the chemical potentials of the metal atoms in the particles (μ M ) differ between two supports by approximately −2( E adh,A – E adh,B ) V m / D, where E ad,i is the adhesion energy between the metal and support i, and V m is the molar volume of the bulk metal. This is consistent with calorimetric measurements of metal vapor adsorption energies onto clean oxide surfaces where the metal grows as 3D particles, which proved that μ M increases with decreasing particle size below 6 nm and, for a given size, decreases with E adh . Since catalytic activity and sintering rates correlate with metal chemical potential, it is thus crucial to understand what properties of catalyst materials control metal/oxide adhesion energies. Trends in how E adh varies with the metal and the support oxide are presented. For a given oxide, E adh increases linearly from metal to metal with increasing heat of formation of the most stable oxide of the metal (per mole metal), or metal oxophilicity, suggesting that metal–oxygen bonds dominate interfacial bonding. For the two different stoichiometric oxide surfaces that have been studied on multiple metals (MgO(100) and CeO 2 (111), the slopes of these lines are the same, but their offset is large (∼2 J/m 2 ). Adhesion energies increase as MgO(100) ≈ TiO 2 (110) < α-Al 2 O 3 (0001) < CeO 2 (111) ≈ Fe 3 O 4 (111).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Control of metal-support interactions in heterogeneous catalysts to enhance activity and selectivity
van Deelen, T. W., Hernández Mejía, C., & de Jong, K. P. (2019) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-019-0364-x · Cited by 2,349
Sulfur-anchoring synthesis of platinum intermetallic nanoparticle catalysts for fuel cells
Yang, C.-L., Wang, L.-N., Yin, P., Liu, J., Chen, M.-X., Yan, Q.-Q., Wang, Z.-S., Xu, S.-L., Chu, S.-Q., Cui, C., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abj9980 · Cited by 908
Metal–support interactions in metal oxide-supported atomic, cluster, and nanoparticle catalysis
Leybo, D., Etim, U. J., Monai, M., Bare, S. R., Zhong, Z., & Vogt, C. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d4cs00527a · Cited by 417
Understanding chemical and physical mechanisms in atomic layer deposition
Richey, N. E., de Paula, C., & Bent, S. F. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5133390 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Hemmingson, S. L., & Campbell, C. T.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-01-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1196-1203
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2560655910
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Adhesion Energies of Metal Nanoparticles on Oxide Surfaces: Understanding Support Effects in Catalysis and Nanotechnology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsnano.6b07502
- The paper
- Hemmingson, S. L., & Campbell, C. T. (2017). Trends in Adhesion Energies of Metal Nanoparticles on Oxide Surfaces: Understanding Support Effects in Catalysis and Nanotechnology. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b07502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.