The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms and Barriers in Cancer Nanomedicine: Addressing Challenges, Looking for Solutions
Open accessAbstract
Remarkable progress has recently been made in the synthesis and characterization of engineered nanoparticles for imaging and treatment of cancers, resulting in several promising candidates in clinical trials. Despite these advances, clinical applications of nanoparticle-based therapeutic/imaging agents remain limited by biological, immunological, and translational barriers. In order to overcome the existing status quo in drug delivery, there is a need for open and frank discussion in the nanomedicine community on what is needed to make qualitative leaps toward translation. In this Nano Focus, we present the main discussion topics and conclusions from a recent workshop: "Mechanisms and Barriers in Nanomedicine". The focus of this informal meeting was on biological, toxicological, immunological, and translational aspects of nanomedicine and approaches to move the field forward productively. We believe that these topics reflect the most important issues in cancer nanomedicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The perivascular niche regulates breast tumour dormancy
Ghajar, C. M., Peinado, H., Mori, H., Matei, I. R., Evason, K. J., Brazier, H., Almeida, D., Koller, A., Hajjar, K. A., Stainier, D. Y. R., et al. (2013) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2767 · Cited by 1,148
Chanan-Khan, A., Szebeni, J., Savay, S., Liebes, L., Rafique, N. M., Alving, C. R., & Muggia, F. M. (2003) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg374 · Cited by 479
Cited by
van der Meel, R., Sulheim, E., Shi, Y., Kiessling, F., Mulder, W. J. M., & Lammers, T. (2019) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0567-y · Cited by 1,234
Quantifying the Ligand-Coated Nanoparticle Delivery to Cancer Cells in Solid Tumors
Dai, Q., Wilhelm, S., Ding, D., Syed, A. M., Sindhwani, S., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y. Y., MacMillan, P., & Chan, W. C. W. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b03900 · Cited by 658
Engineering mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug delivery: where are we after two decades?
Vallet-Regí, M., Schüth, F., Lozano, D., Colilla, M., & Manzano, M. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00659b · Cited by 507
Bridging Bio–Nano Science and Cancer Nanomedicine
Björnmalm, M., Thurecht, K. J., Michael, M., Scott, A. M., & Caruso, F. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b04855 · Cited by 382
Park, J., Choi, Y., Chang, H., Um, W., Ryu, J. H., & Kwon, I. C. (2019) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.37198 · Cited by 382
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Anchordoquy, T. J., Barenholz, Y., Boraschi, D., Chorny, M., Decuzzi, P., Dobrovolskaia, M. A., Farhangrazi, Z. S., Farrell, D., Gabizon, A., Ghandehari, H., Godin, B., La-Beck, N. M., Ljubimova, J., Moghimi, S. M., Pagliaro, L., Park, J.-H., Peer, D., Ruoslahti, E., Serkova, N. J., & Simberg, D.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-01-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-18
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2568972635
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
