The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cerium Oxide Nanocrystal Embedded Bimodal Micromesoporous Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Nanospheres as Effective Sulfur Host for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
For developing lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries, it is critical to design advanced cathode materials with high sulfur loading/utilization ratios and strong binding interactions with sulfur species to prevent the dissolution of intermediate polysulfides. Here we report an effective sulfur host material prepared by implanting cerium oxide (CeO 2 ) nanocrystals homogeneously into well-designed bimodal micromesoporous nitrogen-rich carbon (MMNC) nanospheres. With the high conductivity and abundant hierarchical pore structures, MMNC nanospheres can effectively store and entrap sulfur species. Moreover, the inserted polar and electrocatalytically active CeO 2 nanocrystals and high nitrogen content of MMNC can synergistically solve the hurdle of the polysulfide dissolution and furthermore significantly promote stable redox activity. By combining these advantages, CeO 2 /MMNC-S cathodes with 1.4 mg cm –2 sulfur exhibit high reversible capacities (1066 mAh g –1 at 0.2 C after 200 cycles and 836 mAh g –1 at 1.0 C after 500 cycles), good rate capability (737 mAh g –1 at 2.0 C), and high cycle stability (721 mAh g –1 at 2.0 C after 1000 cycles with a low capacity decay of 0.024% per cycle). Furthermore, a high and stable reversible capacity of 611 mAh g –1 is achieved after cycling for 200 cycles with higher sulfur loading of 3.4 mg cm –2 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Advances in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: From Academic Research to Commercial Viability
Chen, Y., Wang, T., Tian, H., Su, D., Zhang, Q., & Wang, G. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202003666 · Cited by 870
Recent Progress on Zn Anodes for Advanced Aqueous Zinc‐Ion Batteries
Nie, C., Wang, G., Wang, D., Wang, M., Gao, X., Bai, Z., Wang, N., Yang, J., Xing, Z., & Dou, S. (2023) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202300606 · Cited by 561
Hierarchically structured porous materials: synthesis strategies and applications in energy storage
Wu, L., Li, Y., Fu, Z., & Su, B.-L. (2020) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaa183 · Cited by 438
Recent Advances in Heterostructure Engineering for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Huang, S., Wang, Z., Von Lim, Y., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, D., & Yang, H. Y. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202003689 · Cited by 438
Self-citationRational Design of MXene/1T‐2H MoS2‐C Nanohybrids for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Zhang, Y., Mu, Z., Yang, C., Xu, Z., Zhang, S., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Lai, J., Sun, Z., Yang, Y., et al. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201707578 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, L., Chen, R., Zhu, G., Hu, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, T., Liu, J., & Jin, Z.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-07-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 7274-7283
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2727207215
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.