The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anionic Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Protect Plant Photosynthesis from Abiotic Stress by Scavenging Reactive Oxygen Species
Abstract
Plant abiotic stress leads to accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a consequent decrease in photosynthetic performance. We demonstrate that a plant nanobionics approach of localizing negatively charged, sub-11 nm, spherical cerium oxide nanoparticles (nanoceria) inside chloroplasts in vivo augments ROS scavenging and photosynthesis of Arabidopsis thaliana plants under excess light (2000 μmol m –2 s –1, 1.5 h), heat (35 °C, 2.5 h), and dark chilling (4 °C, 5 days). Poly(acrylic acid) nanoceria (PNC) with a hydrodynamic diameter (10.3 nm)—lower than the maximum plant cell wall porosity—and negative ζ-potential (−16.9 mV) exhibit significantly higher colocalization (46%) with chloroplasts in leaf mesophyll cells than aminated nanoceria (ANC) (27%) of similar size (12.6 nm) but positive charge (9.7 mV). Nanoceria are transported into chloroplasts via nonendocytic pathways, influenced by the electrochemical gradient of the plasma membrane potential. PNC with a low Ce 3+ /Ce 4+ ratio (35.0%) reduce leaf ROS levels by 52%, including hydrogen peroxide, superoxide anion, and hydroxyl radicals. For the latter ROS, there is no known plant enzyme scavenger. Plants embedded with these PNC that were exposed to abiotic stress exhibit an increase up to 19% in quantum yield of photosystem II, 67% in carbon assimilation rates, and 61% in Rubisco carboxylation rates relative to plants without nanoparticles. In contrast, PNC with high Ce 3+ /Ce 4+ ratio (60.8%) increase overall leaf ROS levels and do not protect photosynthesis from oxidative damage during abiotic stress. This study demonstrates that anionic, spherical, sub-11 nm PNC with low Ce 3+ /Ce 4+ ratio can act as a tool to study the impact of oxidative stress on plant photosynthesis and to protect plants from abiotic stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction
Apel, K., & Hirt, H. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 · Cited by 11,723
Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants
Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 · Cited by 11,663
Photosynthetic Response and Adaptation to Temperature in Higher Plants
Berry, J., & Bjorkman, O. (1980) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.002423 · Cited by 3,063
Production and Scavenging of Reactive Oxygen Species in Chloroplasts and Their Functions
Asada, K. (2006) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.106.082040 · Cited by 2,752
Rosenzweig, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Ruane, A. C., Müller, C., Arneth, A., Boote, K. J., Folberth, C., Glotter, M., Khabarov, N., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1222463110 · Cited by 2,319
Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications
Murchie, E. H., & Lawson, T. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ert208 · Cited by 2,195
Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress
Murata, N., Takahashi, S., Nishiyama, Y., & Allakhverdiev, S. I. (2007) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.11.019 · Cited by 1,583
Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective
Cramer, G. R., Urano, K., Delrot, S., Pezzotti, M., & Shinozaki, K. (2011) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-11-163 · Cited by 1,375
Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves
SHARKEY, T. D., BERNACCHI, C. J., FARQUHAR, G. D., & SINGSAAS, E. L. (2007) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01710.x · Cited by 1,317
Superoxide dismutase mimetic properties exhibited by vacancy engineered ceria nanoparticles
Korsvik, C., Patil, S., Seal, S., & Self, W. T. (2007) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/b615134e · Cited by 1,278
Cited by
Nanoparticle-Based Sustainable Agriculture and Food Science: Recent Advances and Future Outlook
Mittal, D., Kaur, G., Singh, P., Yadav, K., & Ali, S. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Nanotechnology · doi:10.3389/fnano.2020.579954 · Cited by 788
Avellan, A., Yun, J., Morais, B. P., Clement, E. T., Rodrigues, S. M., & Lowry, G. V. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c00178 · Cited by 412
Nanobiotechnology-based strategies for enhanced crop stress resilience
Zhao, L., Bai, T., Wei, H., Gardea-Torresdey, J. L., Keller, A., & White, J. C. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00596-7 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, H., Tito, N., & Giraldo, J. P.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-11-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 11283-11297
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2765154889
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 20.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anionic Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Protect Plant Photosynthesis from Abiotic Stress by Scavenging Reactive Oxygen Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsnano.7b05723
- The paper
- Wu, H., Tito, N., & Giraldo, J. P. (2017). Anionic Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Protect Plant Photosynthesis from Abiotic Stress by Scavenging Reactive Oxygen Species. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b05723
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.