The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective
Open accessAbstract
The natural environment for plants is composed of a complex set of abiotic stresses and biotic stresses. Plant responses to these stresses are equally complex. Systems biology approaches facilitate a multi-targeted approach by allowing one to identify regulatory hubs in complex networks. Systems biology takes the molecular parts (transcripts, proteins and metabolites) of an organism and attempts to fit them into functional networks or models designed to describe and predict the dynamic activities of that organism in different environments. In this review, research progress in plant responses to abiotic stresses is summarized from the physiological level to the molecular level. New insights obtained from the integration of omics datasets are highlighted. Gaps in our knowledge are identified, providing additional focus areas for crop improvement research in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888
Plant productivity and environment
Boyer, J. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.218.4571.443 · Cited by 3,959
Sugar signals and molecular networks controlling plant growth
Smeekens, S., Ma, J., Hanson, J., & Rolland, F. (2010) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.002 · Cited by 655
The growing scope of applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions using Escherichia coli
Feist, A. M., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1401 · Cited by 545 · cited 1×
“In addition, network reconstructions at the genome-scale are key to quantifying and characterizing the genotype to phenotype relationships [2].”
Background
Cited by
Wu, H., Tito, N., & Giraldo, J. P. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b05723 · Cited by 533
Nejat, N., & Mantri, N. (2017) · Current Issues in Molecular Biology · doi:10.21775/cimb.023.001 · Cited by 287
Effect of Abiotic Stress on Crops
Yadav, S., Modi, P., Dave, A., Vijapura, A., Patel, D., & Patel, M. (2020) · Sustainable Crop Production · doi:10.5772/intechopen.88434 · Cited by 269
Plant Metabolic Modeling: Achieving New Insight into Metabolism and Metabolic Engineering
Baghalian, K., Hajirezaei, M.-R., & Schreiber, F. (2014) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.114.130328 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Cramer, G. R., Urano, K., Delrot, S., Pezzotti, M., & Shinozaki, K.
- Venue
- BMC Plant Biology
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 163
- ISSN
- 1471-2229 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128224069
- Cited by
- 1,375
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 45.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2229-11-163
- The paper
- Cramer, G. R., Urano, K., Delrot, S., Pezzotti, M., & Shinozaki, K. (2011). Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
