The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cobalt Disulfide Nanoparticles Embedded in Porous Carbonaceous Micro-Polyhedrons Interlinked by Carbon Nanotubes for Superior Lithium and Sodium Storage
Abstract
Transition metal sulfides are appealing electrode materials for lithium and sodium batteries owing to their high theoretical capacity. However, they are commonly characterized by rather poor cycling stability and low rate capability. Herein, we investigate CoS 2, serving as a model compound. We synthesized a porous CoS 2 /C micro-polyhedron composite entangled in a carbon-nanotube-based network (CoS 2 -C/CNT), starting from zeolitic imidazolate frameworks-67 as a single precursor. Following an efficient two-step synthesis strategy, the obtained CoS 2 nanoparticles are uniformly embedded in porous carbonaceous micro-polyhedrons, interwoven with CNTs to ensure high electronic conductivity. The CoS 2 -C/CNT nanocomposite provides excellent bifunctional energy storage performance, delivering 1030 mAh g –1 after 120 cycles and 403 mAh g –1 after 200 cycles (at 100 mA g –1 ) as electrode for lithium-ion (LIBs) and sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), respectively. In addition to these high capacities, the electrodes show outstanding rate capability and excellent long-term cycling stability with a capacity retention of 80% after 500 cycles for LIBs and 90% after 200 cycles for SIBs. In situ X-ray diffraction reveals a significant contribution of the partially graphitized carbon to the lithium and at least in part also for the sodium storage and the report of a two-step conversion reaction mechanism of CoS 2, eventually forming metallic Co and Li 2 S/Na 2 S. Particularly the lithium storage capability at elevated (dis-)charge rates, however, appears to be substantially pseudocapacitive, thus benefiting from the highly porous nature of the nanocomposite.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · Cited by 5,153
Cited by
High-entropy energy materials: challenges and new opportunities
Ma, Y., Ma, Y., Wang, Q., Schweidler, S., Botros, M., Fu, T., Hahn, H., Brezesinski, T., & Breitung, B. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00505g · Cited by 963
Self-citationYao, L., Gu, Q., & Yu, X. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c09898 · Cited by 320
Optimized Metal Chalcogenides for Boosting Water Splitting
Yin, J., Jin, J., Lin, H., Yin, Z., Li, J., Lu, M., Guo, L., Xi, P., Tang, Y., & Yan, C. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201903070 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, Y., Ma, Y., Bresser, D., Ji, Y., Geiger, D., Kaiser, U., Streb, C., Varzi, A., & Passerini, S.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-06-25
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 7220-7231
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2810583075
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.