Triboelectric Nanogenerator Driven Self-Powered Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Based on Hematite Photoanodes
Abstract
Hematite is one of the most promising photoanodes for photoelectrochemical (PEC) solar water splitting. However, due to the low conduction band position for water reduction, an external bias is necessarily required with the consumption of extra power. In this work, a titanium modified hematite (Ti-Fe 2 O 3 ) photoanode-based self-powered PEC water splitting system in tandem with a rotatory disc-shaped triboelectric nanogenerator (RD-TENG) has been developed. It is a fantastic strategy to effectively drive the hematite-based PEC water splitting by using the environmental mechanical energy through a TENG. When the rotation speed is 65 rpm (water flowing rate ∼0.61 m/s), the peak current reaches to 0.12 mA under illumination contrast to that in the dark with almost zero. As for 80 rpm, the peak currents are 0.17 and 0.33 mA in the dark or under illumination, respectively, indicating the simultaneous occurrence of electrolysis and PEC water splitting. When higher than 120 rpm, the peak current in the dark is nearly equal to that under illumination, which can be attributed to the high enough peak voltage for direct electrolysis of water. Such a self-powered PEC water splitting system provides an alternative strategy that enables to convert both solar and mechanical energies into chemical energies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The H2 evolution rate of the RD-TENG-driven system is 5.56 μL min−1 at a rotation speed of 140 rpm, and increases to 6.67 μL min−1 when combined with solar energy.
“The rate of H 2 evolution is 5.56 μL min -1 at a rotation speed of 140 rpm, and when combined with solar energy, the light further accelerates water decomposition, resulting in a rate of 6.67 μL min -1 (Figure 10f).”
From Advances in Blue Energy Fuels: Harvesting Energy from Ocean for Self‐Powered Electrolysis (2025) · cites this paper as [252]
In the RD-TENG-driven system, the AC output is transformed and rectified into a modified DC output that provides sufficient external bias to drive water splitting at the hematite photoanode, accelerating the rate of O2 evolution.
“In this system (Figure 10a), the AC output of the RD-TENG is transformed and rectified into a modified DC output, providing sufficient external bias to drive the water-splitting process based on the hematite photoanode, accelerating the rate of O 2 evolution.”
From Advances in Blue Energy Fuels: Harvesting Energy from Ocean for Self‐Powered Electrolysis (2025) · cites this paper as [252]
Wei et al. developed a self-powered photoelectrochemical (PEC) water-splitting system based on hematite photoanodes driven by a rotatory disc-shaped triboelectric nanogenerator (RD-TENG).
“Wei et al. [252] developed a self-powered PEC water-splitting system based on hematite photoanodes driven by a rotatory discshaped TENG (RD-TENG).”
From Advances in Blue Energy Fuels: Harvesting Energy from Ocean for Self‐Powered Electrolysis (2025) · cites this paper as [252]
Cites
Self‐Powered Water Splitting Using Flowing Kinetic Energy
Tang, W., Han, Y., Han, C. B., Gao, C. Z., Cao, X., & Wang, Z. L. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201404071 · Cited by 223 · cited 1× · see citing works
“self-powered water splitting for hydrogen generation.(27) Soon after, Li et al.”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advances in Blue Energy Fuels: Harvesting Energy from Ocean for Self‐Powered Electrolysis
Ock, I. W., Yin, J., Wang, S., Zhao, X., Baik, J. M., & Chen, J. (2025) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202400563 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wei, A., Xie, X., Wen, Z., Zheng, H., Lan, H., Shao, H., Sun, X., Zhong, J., & Lee, S.-T.
- Affiliations
- Soochow University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wen, Zhen
- Sun, Xuhui
- Zhong, Jun
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-07-23
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 8625-8632
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2884896166
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20170343)
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M610346)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1432249, U1732110)
- Centre for Synchrotron Radiation Research
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Soochow University
- State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials, Zhejiang University (SKL2018-03)
- Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Iron oxide chemistry and applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
- Keywords
- triboelectric nanogenerator, photoelectrochemical water splitting, hematite photoanodes, self-powered devices, mechanical energy harvesting, solar water splitting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review