The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct/Alternating Current Electrochemical Method for Removing and Recovering Heavy Metal from Water Using Graphene Oxide Electrode
Abstract
Treatment of heavy-metal pollution in both point-of-use water and industrial wastewater is critical in protecting human health and the environment. Current methods for heavy-metal treatment in both sources have limitations. For point-of-use water, current methods usually suffer from limited capacity and difficulties in spontaneously removing multiple heavy metals. For industrial wastewater, current methods greatly reduce the value of heavy metal by precipitating them as sludge which requires further treatment. Here we developed an electrochemical method that can treat both low-concentration and high-concentration heavy-metal pollution using either direct current (DC) or alternating current (AC) electrodeposition with graphene-oxide-modified carbon felt electrode (CF-GO). The graphene oxide provides a high density of surface functional groups to assist the electrodeposition. The electrodeposition method showed 2 orders of magnitude higher capacity (>29 g heavy metal for 1 g of graphene oxide) compared with traditional adsorption methods. For low levels of heavy-metal pollution in point-of-use water, DC electrodeposition with a CF-GO electrode can reduce single heavy-metal ion pollution (Cu, Cd, and Pb) as well as multiple ion mixtures to below safe water drinking levels. This method can tolerate a much wider range of heavy-metal pollution in point-of-use water than traditional adsorption methods. For high-level pollution in industrial wastewater, AC electrodeposition can recover >99.9% heavy-metal ions. By tuning the AC frequency and voltage, the electrodeposition method can further selectively recover Cu, Cd, and Pb separately, which adds values to the heavy-metal removal process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review
Fu, F., & Wang, Q. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 · Cited by 8,703
Hazards of heavy metal contamination
Järup, L. (2003) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldg032 · Cited by 6,508
A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals
Bailey, S. E., Olin, T. J., Bricka, R. M., & Adrian, D. D. (1999) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(98)00475-8 · Cited by 3,027
Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment
Qu, X., Alvarez, P. J. J., & Li, Q. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058 · Cited by 2,444
Physico–chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals
Kurniawan, T. A., Chan, G. Y. S., Lo, W.-H., & Babel, S. (2006) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2006.01.015 · Cited by 2,072
Wei, B., & Yang, L. (2010) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2009.09.014 · Cited by 2,030
Khan, S., Cao, Q., Zheng, Y. M., Huang, Y. Z., & Zhu, Y. G. (2008) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.056 · Cited by 1,946
Use of iron oxide nanomaterials in wastewater treatment: A review
Xu, P., Zeng, G. M., Huang, D. L., Feng, C. L., Hu, S., Zhao, M. H., Lai, C., Wei, Z., Huang, C., Xie, G. X., et al. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.023 · Cited by 1,929
Few-Layered Graphene Oxide Nanosheets As Superior Sorbents for Heavy Metal Ion Pollution Management
Zhao, G., Li, J., Ren, X., Chen, C., & Wang, X. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es203439v · Cited by 1,845
Simultaneous Nitrogen Doping and Reduction of Graphene Oxide
Li, X., Wang, H., Robinson, J. T., Sanchez, H., Diankov, G., & Dai, H. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja907098f · Cited by 1,801
Cited by
Biological remediation technologies for dyes and heavy metals in wastewater treatment: New insight
Singh, A., Pal, D. B., Mohammad, A., Alhazmi, A., Haque, S., Yoon, T., Srivastava, N., & Gupta, V. K. (2022) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126154 · Cited by 466
Khan, F. S. A., Mubarak, N. M., Tan, Y. H., Khalid, M., Karri, R. R., Walvekar, R., Abdullah, E. C., Nizamuddin, S., & Mazari, S. A. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125375 · Cited by 371
A review on magnetic sensors for monitoring of hazardous pollutants in water resources
Hojjati-Najafabadi, A., Mansoorianfar, M., Liang, T., Shahin, K., & Karimi-Maleh, H. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153844 · Cited by 367
RetractedTee, G. T., Gok, X. Y., & Yong, W. F. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.113248 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, C., Wu, T., Hsu, P.-C., Xie, J., Zhao, J., Liu, K., Sun, J., Xu, J., Tang, J., Ye, Z., Lin, D., & Cui, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-05-22
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 6431-6437
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2946709057
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 11.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct/Alternating Current Electrochemical Method for Removing and Recovering Heavy Metal from Water Using Graphene Oxide Electrode. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsnano.8b09301
- The paper
- Liu, C., Wu, T., Hsu, P.-C., Xie, J., Zhao, J., Liu, K., Sun, J., Xu, J., Tang, J., Ye, Z., Lin, D., & Cui, Y. (2019). Direct/Alternating Current Electrochemical Method for Removing and Recovering Heavy Metal from Water Using Graphene Oxide Electrode. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b09301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.