The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co–Fe Mixed Metal Phosphide Nanocubes with Highly Interconnected-Pore Architecture as an Efficient Polysulfide Mediator for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries have been regarded as one of the most promising candidates for next-generation energy storage owing to their high energy density and low cost. However, the practical deployment of Li–S batteries has been largely impeded by the low conductivity of sulfur, the shuttle effect of polysulfides, and the low areal sulfur loading. Herein, we report the synthesis of uniform Co–Fe mixed metal phosphide (Co–Fe–P) nanocubes with highly interconnected-pore architecture to overcome the main bottlenecks of Li–S batteries. With the highly interconnected-pore architecture, inherently metallic conductivity, and polar characteristic, the Co–Fe–P nanocubes not only offer sufficient electrical contact to the insulating sulfur for high sulfur utilization and fast redox reaction kinetics but also provide abundant adsorption sites for trapping and catalyzing the conversion of lithium polysulfides to suppress the shuttle effect, which is verified by both the comprehensive experiments and density functional theory calculations. As a result, the sulfur-loaded Co–Fe–P ( [email protected] –Fe–P) nanocubes delivered a high discharge capacity of 1243 mAh g –1 at 0.1 C and excellent cycling stability for 500 cycles with an average capacity decay rate of only 0.043% per cycle at 1 C. Furthermore, the [email protected] –Fe–P electrode showed a high areal capacity of 4.6 mAh cm –2 with superior stability when the sulfur loading was increased to 5.5 mg cm –2 . More impressively, the prototype soft-package Li–S batteries based on [email protected] –Fe–P cathodes also exhibited superior cycling stability with great flexibility, demonstrating their great potential for practical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Shi, Y., Li, M., Yu, Y., & Zhang, B. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee02577a · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y., Zhang, W., Zhou, D., Tian, H., Su, D., Wang, C., Stockdale, D., Kang, F., Li, B., & Wang, G.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-03-29
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4731-4741
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2933051591
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.