The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly Adhesive Li-BN Nanosheet Composite Anode with Excellent Interfacial Compatibility for Solid-State Li Metal Batteries
Abstract
Abstract Solid-state lithium metal batteries (SSLMBs) are promising energy storage devices by employing lithium metal anodes and solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) to offer high energy density and high safety. However, their efficiency is limited by Li metal/SSE interface barriers, including insufficient contact area and chemical/electrochemical incompatibility. Herein, a strategy to effectively improve the adhesiveness of Li metal to garnet-type SSE is proposed by adding only a few two-dimensional boron nitride nanosheets (BNNS) (5 wt %) into Li metal by triggering the transition from point contact to complete adhesion between Li metal and ceramic SSE. The interface between the Li-BNNS composite anode and the garnet exhibits a low interfacial resistance of 9 Ω cm2, which is significantly lower than that of bare Li/garnet interface (560 Ω cm2). Furthermore, the enhanced contact and the additional BNNS in the interface act synergistically to offer a high critical current density of 1.5 mA/cm2 and a stable electrochemical plating/striping over 380 h. Moreover, the full cell paired with the Li-BNNS composite anode and the LiFePO4 cathode shows stable cycling performance at room temperature. Our results introduce an appealing composite strategy with two-dimensional materials to overcome the interface challenges, which provide more opportunities for the development of SSLMBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Cited by
Confronting the Challenges in Lithium Anodes for Lithium Metal Batteries
Wang, Q., Liu, B., Shen, Y., Wu, J., Zhao, Z., Zhong, C., & Hu, W. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202101111 · Cited by 531
Reducing the thickness of solid-state electrolyte membranes for high-energy lithium batteries
Wu, J., Yuan, L., Zhang, W., Li, Z., Xie, X., & Huang, Y. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee02241a · Cited by 425
Self-citationZhao, F., Sun, Q., Yu, C., Zhang, S., Adair, K., Wang, S., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Liang, J., Wang, C., et al. (2020) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00207 · Cited by 294
Strategies to anode protection in lithium metal battery: A review
Li, J., Kong, Z., Liu, X., Zheng, B., Fan, Q. H., Garratt, E., Schuelke, T., Wang, K., Xu, H., & Jin, H. (2021) · InfoMat · doi:10.1002/inf2.12189 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Wen, J., Huang, Y., Duan, J., Wu, Y., Luo, W., Zhou, L., Hu, C., Huang, L., Zheng, X., Yang, W., Wen, Z., & Huang, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-12-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 14549-14556
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2990482559
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
