Cited by 9Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsClick Chemistry and Applications

Simple Method to Quantify Protein Abundances from 1000 Cells

Open access
Vitrinel, Burcu, Iannitelli, Dylan E., Mazzoni, Esteban O., Christiaen, Lionel, Vogel, Christine·2020·ACS Omega

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The rise of single-cell transcriptomics has created an urgent need for similar approaches that use a minimal number of cells to quantify expression levels of proteins. We integrated and optimized multiple recent developments to establish a proteomics workflow to quantify proteins from as few as 1000 mammalian stem cells. The method uses chemical peptide labeling, does not require specific equipment other than cell lysis tools, and quantifies >2500 proteins with high reproducibility. We validated the method by comparing mouse embryonic stem cells and in vitro differentiated motor neurons. We identify differentially expressed proteins with small fold changes and a dynamic range in abundance similar to that of standard methods. Protein abundance measurements obtained with our protocol compared well to corresponding transcript abundance and to measurements using standard inputs. The protocol is also applicable to other systems, such as fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-purified cells from the tunicate Ciona. Therefore, we offer a straightforward and accurate method to acquire proteomics data from minimal input samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsomega.0c01191

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Vitrinel, B., Iannitelli, D. E., Mazzoni, E. O., Christiaen, L., & Vogel, C.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Vogel, Christine
Venue
ACS Omega
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
5
Issue
25
Pages
15537-15546
ISSN
2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036556948
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Omega (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL108643)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM127089)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1F31NS103447-01A1)
  • American Heart Association (18PRE33990254)
  • Leducq Foundation (15CVD01)
  • Project ALS (A13-0416)
  • Zegar Family Foundation Fund for Genomics Research at New York University (NA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
Keywords
single-cell proteomics, protein abundance quantification, mouse embryonic stem cells, motor neurons, differentially expressed proteins, transcriptome comparison, Ciona

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review