Cited by 64Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques

CoNiSe2 Nanostructures for Clean Energy Production

Open access
Jansi Rani, Balasubramanian, Ravi, Ganesan, Yuvakkumar, Rathinam, Saravanakumar, Balasubramaniam, Thambidurai, Mariyappan, Dang, Cuong, Velauthapillai, Dhayalan·2020·ACS Omega

Abstract

Comparative investigation of the electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity for clean energy production was performed by fabricating three different electrodes, namely, NiSe2, CoSe2, and CoNiSe2, synthesized by hydrothermal treatment. Cubic, orthorhombic, and hexagonal structures of NiSe2, CoSe2, and CoNiSe2 were confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and also by other characterization studies. Perfect nanospheres, combination of distorted nanospheres and tiny nanoparticles, and sharp-edge nanostructures of NiSe2, CoSe2, and CoNiSe2 were explored by surface morphological images. Higher OER activity of the binary CoNiSe2 electrode was achieved as 188 mA/g current density with a comparatively low overpotential of 234 mV along with higher conductivity and low charge transfer resistance when compared to its unary NiSe2 and CoSe2 electrodes. A low Tafel slope value of 82 mV/dec was also achieved for the same binary CoNiSe2 electrode in a half-cell configuration. The overall 100% retention achieved for all of the fabricated electrodes in a stability test of OER activity suggested that the excellent optimum condition was obtained during the synthesis. This could definitely be a revelation in the synthesis of novel binary combinations of affordable metal selenides for clean energy production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsomega.0c01476

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The shift and overlap of NiSe2 and CoSe2 XRD peaks at 30-40 degrees indicate lattice distortion from interaction between the two selenides and support heterostructure formation.

    “Compared with the standard cards, the shift and superposition of NiSe 2 and CoSe 2 characteristic peaks at 301-401 could be observed, which was attributed to the lattice distortion caused by the interaction between the two selenide crystals, thus proving the formation of a bimetallic selenide heterostructure.37,38”

    From Bimetallic Ni–Co selenide heterostructure aerogel for highly efficient overall water splitting (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results and Discussion XRD passage says all three samples matched their standard diffraction patterns, contrary to the claimed shift from the standard cards. It identifies a distinct hexagonal CoNiSe2 pattern and confirms binary selenide formation, but does not attribute that formation to overlapping NiSe2 and CoSe2 peaks or interaction-induced lattice distortion. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Co site in NiSe2-CoSe2 possessed better adsorption property and high activity toward HER.

    “indicating that the Co site possessed better adsorption property and high activity toward HER[21,51].”

    From Interface and electronic structure regulation of Mo-doped NiSe2-CoSe2 heterostructure aerogel for efficient overall water splitting (2023) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Introduction and Results and Discussion describe CoNiSe2 activity for oxygen evolution (OER), not hydrogen evolution (HER). A search for Co-site adsorption and HER activity found no passage assessing either claim; the paper’s OER findings do not establish or refute them. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jansi Rani, B., Ravi, G., Yuvakkumar, R., Saravanakumar, B., Thambidurai, M., Dang, C., & Velauthapillai, D.
Affiliations
  • Alagappa University , , , ,
  • Alagappa University (IN)
  • Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and Technology (IN)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
Corresponding author
  • Yuvakkumar, Rathinam
  • Velauthapillai, Dhayalan
Venue
ACS Omega
Published
2020-06-09
Volume
5
Issue
24
Pages
14702-14710
ISSN
2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034395962
Cited by
64
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Omega (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Keywords
NiSe2, CoSe2, oxygen evolution reaction, hydrothermal synthesis, nanostructures, nanospheres, crystal structure, Tafel slope, charge transfer resistance, electrode stability, clean energy generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review