Cited by 274Barrier Structure and Function StudiesNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Nanocarriers as Potential Drug Delivery Candidates for Overcoming the Blood–Brain Barrier: Challenges and Possibilities

Open access
Ahlawat, Jyoti, Guillama Barroso, Gileydis, Masoudi Asil, Shima, Alvarado, Melinda, Armendariz, Isabela, Bernal, Jose, Carabaza, Ximena, Chavez, Stephanie +20 more·2020·ACS Omega

Abstract

The design of a drug that successfully overcomes the constraints imposed by the blood–brain barrier (BBB, which acts as a gatekeeper to the entry of substances into the brain) requires an understanding of the biological firewall. It is also of utmost importance to understand the physicochemical properties of the said drug and how it engages the BBB to avoid undesired side effects. Since fewer than 5% of the tested molecules can pass through the BBB, drug development pertaining to brain-related disorders takes inordinately long to develop. Furthermore, in most cases it is also unsuccessful for allied reasons. Several drug delivery systems (DDSs) have shown excellent potential in drug delivery across the BBB while demonstrating minimal side effects. This mini-review summarizes key features of the BBB, recapitulates recent advances in our understanding of the BBB, and highlights existing strategies for the delivery of drug to the brain parenchyma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsomega.0c01592

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tight junctions are the main functional components in sustaining the permeability barrier and controlling tissue homeostasis in the blood-brain barrier.

    “In the BBB, tight junctions are the main functional components in sustaining the permeability barrier and controlling tissue homeostasis.88–91”

    From The blood–brain barrier: Structure, regulation and drug delivery (2023) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Introduction’s “Blood–Brain Barrier (BBB)” section says tight junctions are the BBB’s main junctional component and restrict passage between endothelial cells, supporting their role in its permeability barrier. It attributes maintenance of homeostasis to the BBB as a whole, however, rather than specifically saying tight junctions control tissue homeostasis. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahlawat, J., Guillama Barroso, G., Masoudi Asil, S., Alvarado, M., Armendariz, I., Bernal, J., Carabaza, X., Chavez, S., Cruz, P., Escalante, V., Estorga, S., Fernandez, D., Lozano, C., Marrufo, M., Ahmad, N., Negrete, S., Olvera, K., Parada, X., Portillo, B., Ramirez, A., Ramos, R., Rodriguez, V., Rojas, P., Romero, J., Suarez, D., Urueta, G., Viel, S., & Narayan, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
  • The University of Havana , , ,
  • The University of Texas at El Paso , , , ,
  • IFTM University (IN)
Corresponding author
Narayan, Mahesh
Venue
ACS Omega
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
5
Issue
22
Pages
12583-12595
ISSN
2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3030526746
Cited by
274
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Omega (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (226141286A)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1SC3 GM111200 01A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
blood-brain barrier, nanocarriers, drug delivery systems, brain drug delivery, blood-brain barrier permeability, physicochemical properties of drugs, brain disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review