Cited by 10Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems

Combustion versus gasification in power- and biomass-to-x processes: an exergetic analysis

Open access
Mucci, Simone, Mitsos, Alexander, Bongartz, Dominik·2024·ACS Omega

Abstract

Residual biomass is a promising carbon feedstock for the production of electricity-based organic chemicals and fuels since, unlike carbon dioxide captured from point sources or air, it also has a valuable energy input. Biomass can be converted into an intermediate stream suitable for Power-to-X processes mainly via combustion or gasification. Such combined processes are generally called biohybrid or Power- and Biomass-to-X processes. To investigate the potential of biomass utilization in Power- and Biomass-to-X processes and identify inherent efficiency differences between these pathways, we model the process units with simple mass and energy balances considering empirical parameters for the key process units and perform an exergetic analysis. The analysis is conducted for several molecules of interest for the chemical and transport sectors with different C:H:O ratios, i.e., methane, methanol, dimethyl ether, and dodecane. For all considered products, the Power- and Biomass-to-X processes with biomass gasification, either with pure oxygen or steam as oxidizing agents, have a significantly higher (∼15-20 percentage points) exergy efficiency. This difference is mainly due to the lower exergy loss for water electrolysis since a lower amount of hydrogen is needed and to the higher exergy efficiency of the gasification unit compared to that of the combustion unit. Therefore, gasification-based Power- and Biomass-to-X processes have clear thermodynamic advantages in the ideal case. These conclusions obtained with the simple models are confirmed by modeling a Power- and Biomass-to-Methanol process in detail, also accounting for practical factors such as side reactions, incomplete reactant conversion, and ash formation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsomega.4c05549

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mucci, S., Mitsos, A., & Bongartz, D.
Affiliations
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Bongartz, Dominik
Venue
ACS Omega
Published
2024-11-21
Volume
9
Issue
49
Pages
48213-48231
ISSN
2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404580587
Cited by
10
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Omega (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung (03HY122D)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Keywords
biomass gasification, biomass combustion, power-to-X, exergy analysis, exergy efficiency, oxygen gasification, steam gasification, water electrolysis, hydrogen production, methanol synthesis, dimethyl ether, n-dodecane, methane, ash formation, side reactions, incomplete conversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review