Cited by 49Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Particle Size-Controlled Growth of Carbon-Supported Platinum Nanoparticles (Pt/C) through Water-Assisted Polyol Synthesis

Open access
Sharma, Raghunandan, Wang, Yue, Li, Fan, Chamier, Jessica, Andersen, Shuang Ma·2019·ACS Omega

Abstract

A water-assisted control of Pt nanoparticle size during a surfactant-free, microwave-assisted polyol synthesis of the carbon-supported platinum nanoparticles (Pt/C) in a mixture of ethylene glycol and water using (NH4)2PtCl6 as the Pt precursor is demonstrated. The particle size was tuned between ∼2 and ∼6 nm by varying either the H2O volume percent or the Pt precursor concentration during synthesis. The electrochemical surface area (ECSA) and the oxygen-reduction reaction activity obtained for the Pt/C electrocatalyst show a catalytic performance competitive to that of the state-of-the-art commercial Pt/C electrocatalysts used for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell electrodes (ECSA: ∼70 m2/g; half-wave potential for oxygen reduction reaction: 0.83 V vs reversible hydrogen electrode). The synthesized Pt/C electrocatalysts show durability equivalent to or better than that of the commercial Pt/C. The durability was found to improve with increasing particle size, with the ECSA loss values being ∼70 and ∼55% for the particle sizes of 2.1 and 4.3 nm, respectively. The study may be used as a route to synthesize Pt/C electrocatalysts from a convenient and economic Pt precursor (NH4)2PtCl6 and avoiding the use of alkaline media.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsomega.9b02351

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Durability testing via potential cycling indicated the highest stability for the pure EG synthesized catalyst followed by a sample synthesized with 95 vol% H2O, both surpassing the commercial reference.

    “Durability testing via potential cycling further indicated the highest stability for the pure EG synthesized catalyst followed by a sample synthesized with 95 vol% H 2 O, both surpassing the commercial Ref. 21.”

    From Effect of Solvent Ratio (Ethylene Glycol/Water) in the Synthesis of Pt/C Cathode Catalysts on PEM Fuel Cell Performance (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results and Discussion section (page unavailable) reports that the 00% H₂O (pure EG) and 95% H₂O catalysts had higher durability than the 70% catalyst after potential cycling. Figure 5’s caption says a commercial Pt/C catalyst was included in the durability plots, but the available text does not state that pure EG ranked above 95% H₂O or that both surpassed the commercial catalyst. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Published data reveals trends in ECSA and activity of Pt/C based cathode catalysts synthesized by the polyol method related to synthesis conditions and resulting particle sizes.

    “In summary, the published data reveals trends in the ECSA and activity of Pt/C based cathode catalysts synthesized by the polyol method related to the synthesis conditions and resulting particle sizes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, R., Wang, Y., Li, F., Chamier, J., & Andersen, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Beijing University of Technology (CN)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • Sharma, Raghunandan
  • Andersen, Shuang Ma
Venue
ACS Omega
Published
2019-09-10
Volume
4
Issue
13
Pages
15711-15720
ISSN
2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972547560
Cited by
49
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Omega (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Udenrigsministeriet (18-MG02SDU, 19-MG01SDU, 19-MG02SDU)
  • COWIfonden (NA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
platinum nanoparticles, Pt/C catalyst, particle size control, microwave-assisted synthesis, surfactant-free synthesis, ethylene glycol-water mixture, oxygen reduction reaction, electrochemically active surface area, catalyst stability, proton exchange membrane fuel cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review