The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Quality Factor Dielectric Metasurfaces for Ultraviolet Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy
Abstract
Chiral-optical spectroscopies, such as circular dichroism, are critical in the biomedical, pharmaceutical, and agrochemical industries for revealing structural information about molecules and determining the purity of chemical samples. Emerging nanophotonic platforms have been shown to increase the intrinsically weak interaction between circularly polarized light and chiral molecules through the concentration of the local density of optical chirality, C . However, enhancements in C have been limited to infrared and visible frequencies, while the chiral absorption features of most small molecules are in the ultraviolet. Furthermore, achievable C enhancements in nanophotonic systems remain relatively low, especially when averaged across the sample volume. Here, we use full-field simulations to design a high quality factor (high Q ) diamond metasurface that enhances C by over 3 orders of magnitude in the ultraviolet regime. The diamond nanostructures enable ultraviolet Mie resonances while a biperiodic disk lattice activates high Q resonances that significantly increase the electromagnetic field intensities. When a high Q electric dipole and magnetic dipole mode are spatially and spectrally overlapped, a Kerker-like condition emerges that enables uniform sign C enhancements that are locally as high as 1130-fold. Even when averaged across the unit cell and 40 nm away from the surface, enhancements in C exceed 100-fold. We show how the quality factor and C can be further tuned by adjusting the structural asymmetry via the diameter offset in the biperiodic lattice. Our results pave the way for ultrasensitive chiral spectroscopy and efficient light-mediated enantiomer separation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Protein folding and misfolding
Dobson, C. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02261 · Cited by 4,791
Laboratory of Toxicology, F. O. P., Chuong, P.-H., Nguyen, L. A., Department of Pharmacy, L. S. P. C. H., He, H., & Department of Analytical Chemistry, C. P. U. (2006) · International Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.59566/ijbs.2006.2085 · Cited by 1,224
Existence of a New Conservation Law in Electromagnetic Theory
Lipkin, D. M. (1964) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1704165 · Cited by 438
Cited by
Metasurface Micro/Nano-Optical Sensors: Principles and Applications
Qin, J., Jiang, S., Wang, Z., Cheng, X., Li, B., Shi, Y., Tsai, D. P., Liu, A. Q., Huang, W., & Zhu, W. (2022) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c03310 · Cited by 359
Zhang, Y., Chang, K., Ogunlade, B., Herndon, L., Tadesse, L. F., Kirane, A. R., & Dionne, J. A. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c04282 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, J., Lawrence, M., & Dionne, J. A.
- Venue
- ACS Photonics
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-11-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-42
- ISSN
- 2330-4022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2987947199
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.