Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Highly Efficient p-Toluenesulfonic Acid-Based Deep-Eutectic Solvents for Cathode Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries

Roldán-Ruiz, María Jesús, Ferrer, María Luisa, Gutiérrez, María Concepción, Monte, Francisco del·2020·ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Abstract

The common use of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) in portable devices and electric vehicles is promoting an exponential growth of the rechargeable batteries market. Their use in electric vehicles while not yet so common will be favored in the near future by government incentives aiming to mitigate global warming effects coming from combustion engines. Despite the remote risk of cobalt (Co) and lithium (Li) supplies running low, metals recovery from “postconsumer” scrap is a rapidly expanding topic in the political agenda within the context of the circular economy. Among other recycling technologies, processes using mild conditions and providing high recycling efficiencies are gaining increased interest. For instance, organic acids are particularly interesting for LiCoO 2 dissolution even though they typically need the additional use of reducing agents. Herein, we explore the Co (and Li) recovery from spent LIBs using deep eutectic solvents (DESs) at temperatures as low as 90 °C, at times of dissolution as short as 15 min and without the use of any additional reducing agent. In particular, we used the eutectic mixture composed of p -toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) monohydrate and choline chloride (ChCl) (e.g., PTSA·H 2 O·ChCl DES with a 1:1:1 molar ratio) and aqueous dilutions thereof (e.g., PTSA·2H 2 O·ChCl DES and PTSA·3H 2 O·ChCl DES with 1:2:1 and 1:3:1 molar ratios, respectively). Compared to organic acids, PTSAChCl-based DESs offered a significant reduction of the solute to solvent ratio (in g/L) needed for full Co dissolution. This brings benefits both in economic and sustainable terms that handling low solvent volumes has in industrial processes. Interestingly, Co recovery efficiencies from spent LIBs reached figures of up to 94% over the whole process relating to the extraction from spent LIBs using PTSAChCl-based DESs, the precipitation with either Na 2 CO 3 or (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3, and the final calcination to obtain Co 3 O 4 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00892

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Roldán-Ruiz, M. J., Ferrer, M. L., Gutiérrez, M. C., & Monte, F. D.
Venue
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2020-03-20
Volume
8
Issue
14
Pages
5437-5445
ISSN
2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010894839
Cited by
197
References
4
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly Efficient p-Toluenesulfonic Acid-Based Deep-Eutectic Solvents for Cathode Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00892
The paper
Roldán-Ruiz, M. J., Ferrer, M. L., Gutiérrez, M. C., & Monte, F. D. (2020). Highly Efficient p-Toluenesulfonic Acid-Based Deep-Eutectic Solvents for Cathode Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00892

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.