Cited by 41Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Structurally Ordered Pt3Co Nanoparticles Anchored on N-Doped Graphene for Highly Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Lin, Caoxin, Huang, Zhiqiao, Zhang, Zeyi, Zeng, Tang, Chen, Runzhe, Tan, Yangyang, Wu, Wei, Mu, Shichun +1 more·2020·ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Abstract

Developing highly efficient catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) play a significant role in the large-scale application of electrochemical water splitting. Here, we develop an ultrafine ordered Pt 3 Co NPs supported on N-doped graphene (NG), which achieves high HER activity with a small overpotential of 13 mV at 10 mA cm –2 . More importantly, at the overpotential of 20 mV, the ordered Pt 3 Co catalyst (Pt 3 Co/NG-700) indicates 19.0 and 51.8 times mass activity than that of the disordered Pt 3 Co catalyst (Pt 3 Co/NG) and commercialized Pt/C catalyst, respectively. Additionally, the Pt 3 Co/NG-700 electrocatalyst displays outstanding long-term stability under harsh chronopotentiometry and cycling tests in the acidic media. The theory calculations reveal that the extraordinary HER performance on Pt 3 Co/NG-700 electrocatalyst originates from the charge redistribution of Pt induced by Co in the structurally ordered Pt 3 Co intermetallic. The charge redistribution of Pt facilitates the adsorption and dissociation of H* and provides a higher electron transfer and better conductivity, resulting in high HER. Our work opens new opportunities to design noble based alloy catalysts for highly efficient HER.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06547

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, C., Huang, Z., Zhang, Z., Zeng, T., Chen, R., Tan, Y., Wu, W., Mu, S., & Cheng, N.
Affiliations
  • Fuzhou University (CN)
  • Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Niancai
Venue
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2020-11-05
Volume
8
Issue
45
Pages
16938-16945
ISSN
2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097040942
Cited by
41
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21875039)
  • State Key Laboratory of Photocatalysis on Energy and Environment, Fuzhou University (SKLPEE-201814)
  • Fujian Province (50012709)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
nitrogen-doped graphene, hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysts, charge redistribution, electrochemical water splitting, acidic media, catalyst stability, mass activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review