The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellulose Nanoparticles: Structure–Morphology–Rheology Relationships
Abstract
The present study aims to investigate the structure–morphology–rheology relationships for cellulose nanoparticles (CNPs), including cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). CNCs were extracted from never dried CNFs using sulfuric acid with controlled hydrolysis time. The crystalline structure, surface charge, morphology, and rheological behavior of the CNPs were measured and contrasted. The CNF suspensions exhibited rigid solid-like viscoelastic behavior even at a low concentration due to the formation of a highly entangled network. Upon acid hydrolysis, the network of rigid, long, and highly entangled nanofibers was eliminated, resulting in a significant loss of viscoelastic properties. Both steady-state and dynamic rheological measurements showed that the rheological behavior of the CNC suspensions was strongly dependent on the concentration and acid hydrolysis time. The CNC suspensions exhibited elastic gel-like rheological behavior at high concentrations but viscous liquid-like rheological behavior at low concentrations. Longer acid hydrolysis time produced CNCs with a lower aspect ratio, leading to higher critical transition concentration for the formation of anisotropic phase. The aspect ratio of CNCs was predicted from the intrinsic viscosity using the Simha’s equation. The theoretically predicted aspect ratio values corresponded well with the transmission electron microscopy results. Finally, the network of CNF and CNC suspensions were schematically proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pääkkö, M., Ankerfors, M., Kosonen, H., Nykänen, A., Ahola, S., Österberg, M., Ruokolainen, J., Laine, J., Larsson, P. T., Ikkala, O., et al. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm061215p · Cited by 1,962
Beck-Candanedo, S., Roman, M., & Gray, D. G. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049300p · Cited by 1,588
Rosa, M. F., Medeiros, E. S., Malmonge, J. A., Gregorski, K. S., Wood, D. F., Mattoso, L. H. C., Glenn, G., Orts, W. J., & Imam, S. H. (2010) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.059 · Cited by 1,099
Araki, J., Wada, M., Kuga, S., & Okano, T. (1998) · Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects · doi:10.1016/s0927-7757(98)00404-x · Cited by 769
Benhamou, K., Dufresne, A., Magnin, A., Mortha, G., & Kaddami, H. (2014) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.032 · Cited by 188
Cited by
Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials
Foster, E. J., Moon, R. J., Agarwal, U. P., Bortner, M. J., Bras, J., Camarero-Espinosa, S., Chan, K. J., Clift, M. J. D., Cranston, E. D., Eichhorn, S. J., et al. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00895j · Cited by 1,021
Harini, K., Ramya, K., & Sukumar, M. (2018) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.081 · Cited by 192
Hivechi, A., Bahrami, S. H., Siegel, R. A., Siehr, A., Sahoo, A., Milan, P. B., Joghataei, M. T., Amoupour, M., & Simorgh, S. (2021) · Materials Science and Engineering C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2020.111855 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, M.-C., Wu, Q., Song, K., Lee, S., Qing, Y., & Wu, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-04-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 821-832
- ISSN
- 2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2314865974
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellulose Nanoparticles: Structure–Morphology–Rheology Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00144
- The paper
- Li, M.-C., Wu, Q., Song, K., Lee, S., Qing, Y., & Wu, Y. (2015). Cellulose Nanoparticles: Structure–Morphology–Rheology Relationships. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.