Cited by 13Protein Structure and DynamicsBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization

Full and partial agonism of a designed enzyme switch

Open access
Budiardjo, S. Jimmy, Licknack, Timothy J., Cory, Michael B., Kapros, Dora, Roy, Anuradha, Lovell, Scott, Douglas, Justin, Karanicolas, John·2016·ACS Synthetic Biology

Abstract

Chemical biology has long sought to build protein switches for use in molecular diagnostics, imaging, and synthetic biology. The overarching challenge for any type of engineered protein switch is the ability to respond in a selective and predictable manner that caters to the specific environments and time scales needed for the application at hand. We previously described a general method to design switchable proteins, called "chemical rescue of structure", that builds de novo allosteric control sites directly into a protein's functional domain. This approach entails first carving out a buried cavity in a protein via mutation, such that the protein's structure is disrupted and activity is lost. An exogenous ligand is subsequently added to substitute for the atoms that were removed by mutation, restoring the protein's structure and thus its activity. Here, we begin to ask what principles dictate such switches' response to different activating ligands. Using a redesigned β-glycosidase enzyme as our model system, we find that the designed effector site is quite malleable and can accommodate both larger and smaller ligands, but that optimal rescue comes only from a ligand that perfectly replaces the deleted atoms. Guided by these principles, we then altered the shape of this cavity by using different cavity-forming mutations, and predicted different ligands that would better complement these new cavities. These findings demonstrate how the protein switch's response can be tuned via small changes to the ligand with respect to the binding cavity, and ultimately enabled us to design an improved switch. We anticipate that these insights will help enable the design of future systems that tune other aspects of protein activity, whereby, like evolved protein receptors, remolding the effector site can also adjust additional outputs such as substrate selectivity and activation of downstream signaling pathways.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00097

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Addition of indole in allosteric cases serves not to revert a discrete conformational change, but as an allosteric ligand that rescues activity by inducing the protein to refold to its original conformation.

    “Addition of indole in these allosteric cases served not to revert a discrete conformational change, but rather as an allosteric ligand that rescues activity by inducing the protein to refold to its original conformation (Budiardjo et al., 2016)”

    From Allostery in Its Many Disguises: From Theory to Applications (2019) · cites this paper as Budiardjo et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Budiardjo, S. J., Licknack, T. J., Cory, M. B., Kapros, D., Roy, A., Lovell, S., Douglas, J., & Karanicolas, J.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Karanicolas, John
Venue
ACS Synthetic Biology
Published
2016-07-22
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
1475-1484
ISSN
2161-5063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2473526301
Cited by
13
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Synthetic Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (ACI-1053575)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (5P20RR017708, 2R25GM078441, 5P30GM110761, 8P20GM103420)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation
  • Human Frontier Science Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Keywords
protein switches, allosteric regulation, β-glycosidase, ligand-binding cavity, ligand specificity, enzyme activation, de novo protein design
MeSH terms
Allosteric Site, Binding Sites, Glucosidases, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Structure-Activity Relationship, Protein Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review