The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interfacial Microstructure and Properties of Carbon Fiber Composites Modified with Graphene Oxide
Abstract
The performance of carbon fiber-reinforced composites is dependent to a great extent on the properties of fiber-matrix interface. To improve the interfacial properties in carbon fiber/epoxy composites, we directly introduced graphene oxide (GO) sheets dispersed in the fiber sizing onto the surface of individual carbon fibers. The applied graphite oxide, which could be exfoliated to single-layer GO sheets, was verified by atomic force microscope (AFM). The surface topography of modified carbon fibers and the distribution of GO sheets in the interfacial region of carbon fibers were detected by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The interfacial properties between carbon fiber and matrix were investigated by microbond test and three-point short beam shear test. The tensile properties of unidirectional (UD) composites were investigated in accordance with ASTM standards. The results of the tests reveal an improved interfacial and tensile properties in GO-modified carbon fiber composites. Furthermore, significant enhancement of interfacial shear strength (IFSS), interlaminar shear strength (ILSS), and tensile properties was achieved in the composites when only 5 wt % of GO sheets introduced in the fiber sizing. This means that an alternative method for improving the interfacial and tensile properties of carbon fiber composites by controlling the fiber-matrix interface was developed. Such multiscale reinforced composites show great potential with their improved mechanical performance to be likely applied in the aerospace and automotive industries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Graphene-based composite materials
Stankovich, S., Dikin, D. A., Dommett, G. H. B., Kohlhaas, K. M., Zimney, E. J., Stach, E. A., Piner, R. D., Nguyen, S. T., & Ruoff, R. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04969 · Cited by 12,922
Cited by
Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites
Papageorgiou, D. G., Kinloch, I. A., & Young, R. J. (2017) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 · Cited by 2,579
Wang, C., Zhao, M., Li, J., Yu, J., Sun, S., Ge, S., Guo, X., Xie, F., Jiang, B., Wujcik, E. K., et al. (2017) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2017.10.049 · Cited by 355
Sayam, A., Rahman, A. N. M. M., Rahman, M. S., Smriti, S. A., Ahmed, F., Rabbi, M. F., Hossain, M., & Faruque, M. O. (2022) · Carbon Letters · doi:10.1007/s42823-022-00358-2 · Cited by 308
Recent progresses of fabrication and characterization of fibers-reinforced composites: A review
Yang, G., Park, M., & Park, S.-J. (2019) · Composites Communications · doi:10.1016/j.coco.2019.05.004 · Cited by 266
Lu, H., Yao, Y., Huang, W. M., & Hui, D. (2014) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.022 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Fan, X., Yan, C., Li, H., Zhu, Y., Li, X., & Yu, L.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-03-13
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1543-1552
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2072796035
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.