The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
D-A-π-A Featured Sensitizers Bearing Phthalimide and Benzotriazole as Auxiliary Acceptor: Effect on Absorption and Charge Recombination Dynamics in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Abstract
Two organic D-A-π-A sensitizers LS-2 and WS-5 containing N-octyl substituted phthalimide and benzotriazole as auxiliary electron withdrawing units with similar dimension and structure architecture were systematically studied, focusing on photophysical and electrochemical as well as photovoltaic properties in nanocrystalline TiO(2)-based dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Interestingly, with similar five-member benzo-heterocycles, the two auxiliary acceptors of phthalimide and benzotriazole play exactly different roles in absorption and intramolecular charge transfer: (i) in contrast with WS-5 delocalized throughout the entire chromophore, the HOMO orbital of LS-2 is mainly located at the donor part due to the twist conformation with the existence of two carbonyl groups in phthalimide; (ii) the dihedral angles of "D-A" plane and "A-π" plane in LS-2 further suggest that the incorporation of phthalimide moiety results in curvature of electron delocalization over the whole molecule, in agreement with its blue-shifted, relatively narrow absorption spectra and low photocurrent density; (iii) in contrast with the beneficial charge transfer of benzotriazole in WS-5, the phthalimide unit in LS-2 plays an oppositely negative contribution to the charge transfer, that is, blocking intramolecular electron transfer (ICT) from donor to acceptor to some extent; and (iv) in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, the incorporated benzotriazole unit enhances electron lifetime by 18.6-fold, the phthalimide only increases electron lifetime by 5.0-fold. Without coadsorption of chenodeoxylic acid (CDCA), the DSSCs based on WS-5 exhibited a promising maximum conversion efficiency (η) of 8.38% with significant enhancement in all photovoltaic parameters (J(SC) = 15.79 mA cm(-2), V(OC) = 791 mV, ff = 0.67). In contrast, with the very similar D-A-π-A feature changing the additional acceptor from benzotriazole to phthalimide unit, the photovoltaic efficiency based on LS-2 was only 5.11%, decreased by 39%, with less efficient photovoltaic parameters (J(SC) = 10.06 mA cm(-2), V(OC) = 748 mV, ff = 0.68). Therefore, our results demonstrate that it is essential to choose proper subsidiary withdrawing unit in D-A-π-A sensitizer configuration for DSSCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
Xie, Y., Tang, Y., Wu, W., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Li, X., Tian, H., & Zhu, W.-H. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b09665 · Cited by 328
Self-citationZeng, K., Tong, Z., Ma, L., Zhu, W.-H., Wu, W., & Xie, Y. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee04200h · Cited by 266
Self-citationObraztsov, I., Kutner, W., & D'Souza, F. (2017) · Solar RRL · doi:10.1002/solr.201600002 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., Wu, Y., Zhang, Q., Tian, H., & Zhu, W.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-03-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1822-1830
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2326689755
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.