The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flexible and Microporous Chitosan Hydrogel/Nano ZnO Composite Bandages for Wound Dressing: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation
Open accessAbstract
Current wound dressings have disadvantages such as less flexibility, poor mechanical strength, lack of porosity, and a tendency for dressings to adhere onto the wound surface; in addition, a majority of the dressings did not possess antibacterial activity. Hydrogel-based wound dressings would be helpful to provide a cooling sensation and a moisture environment, as well as act as a barrier to microbes. To overcome these hassles, we have developed flexible and microporous chitosan hydrogel/nano zinc oxide composite bandages (CZBs) via the incorporation of zinc oxide nanoparticles (nZnO) into chitosan hydrogel. The prepared nanocomposite bandages were characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, swelling, degradation, blood clotting, antibacterial, cytocompatibility, cell attachment on the material, and cell infiltration into the composite bandages were evaluated. The nanocomposite bandage showed enhanced swelling, blood clotting, and antibacterial activity. Cytocompatibility of the composite bandage has been analyzed in normal human dermal fibroblast cells. Cell attachment and infiltration studies showed that the cells were found attached to the nanocomposite bandages and penetrated into the interior. Furthermore, the in vivo evaluations in Sprague-Dawley rats revealed that these nanocomposite bandages enhanced the wound healing and helped for faster re-epithelialization and collagen deposition. The obtained data strongly encourage the use of these composite bandages for burn wounds, chronic wounds, and diabetic foot ulcers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Functional Hydrogels as Wound Dressing to Enhance Wound Healing
Liang, Y., He, J., & Guo, B. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c04206 · Cited by 3,135
Kamoun, E. A., Kenawy, E.-R. S., & Chen, X. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2017.01.005 · Cited by 1,707
Liu, H., Wang, C., Li, C., Qin, Y., Wang, Z., Yang, F., Li, Z., & Wang, J. (2018) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c7ra13510f · Cited by 915
Chitosan: A Natural Biopolymer with a Wide and Varied Range of Applications
Jiménez-Gómez, C. P., & Cecilia, J. A. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25173981 · Cited by 817
Recent advances in hydrogel based drug delivery systems for the human body
Vashist, A., Vashist, A., Gupta, Y. K., & Ahmad, S. (2014) · J. Mater. Chem. B · doi:10.1039/c3tb21016b · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Sudheesh Kumar, P. T., Lakshmanan, V.-K., Anilkumar, T. V., Ramya, C., Reshmi, P., Unnikrishnan, A. G., Nair, S. V., & Jayakumar, R.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-04-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2618-2629
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2032489408
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flexible and Microporous Chitosan Hydrogel/Nano ZnO Composite Bandages for Wound Dressing: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/am300292v
- The paper
- Sudheesh Kumar, P. T., Lakshmanan, V.-K., Anilkumar, T. V., Ramya, C., Reshmi, P., Unnikrishnan, A. G., Nair, S. V., & Jayakumar, R. (2012). Flexible and Microporous Chitosan Hydrogel/Nano ZnO Composite Bandages for Wound Dressing: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/am300292v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.