The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymer-Composite Materials for Radiation Protection
Abstract
Unwanted exposures to high-energy or ionizing radiation can be hazardous to health. Prolonged or accumulated radiation dosage from either particle-emissions such as alpha/beta, proton, electron, neutron emissions, or high-energy electromagnetic waves such as X-rays/γ rays, may result in carcinogenesis, cell mutations, organ failure, etc. To avoid occupational hazards from these kinds of exposures, researchers have traditionally used heavy metals or their composites to attenuate the radiation. However, protective gear made of heavy metals are not only cumbersome but also are capable of producing more penetrative secondary radiations which requires additional shielding, increasing the cost and the weight factor. Consequently, significant research efforts have been focused toward designing efficient, lightweight, cost-effective, and flexible shielding materials for protection against radiation encountered in various industries (aerospace, hospitals, and nuclear reactors). In this regard, polymer composites have become attractive candidates for developing materials that can be designed to effectively attenuate photon or particle radiation. In this paper, we review the state-of-the-art of polymer composites reinforced with micro/nanomaterials, for their use as radiation shields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating shielding effectiveness for reducing space radiation cancer risks
Cucinotta, F. A., Kim, M.-H. Y., & Ren, L. (2006) · Radiation Measurements · doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.03.011 · Cited by 153
Polyethylene as a radiation shielding standard in simulated cosmic-ray environments
Guetersloh, S., Zeitlin, C., Heilbronn, L., Miller, J., Komiyama, T., Fukumura, A., Iwata, Y., Murakami, T., & Bhattacharya, M. (2006) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms · doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2006.08.019 · Cited by 127
Cited by
Ferreira, F. V., Cividanes, L. S., Gouveia, R. F., & Lona, L. M. F. (2019) · Polymer Engineering & Science · doi:10.1002/pen.24770 · Cited by 443
Rashid, A. B., Haque, M., Islam, S. M. M., & Uddin Labib, K. M. R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24692 · Cited by 361
RetractedProgress of shape memory polymers and their composites in aerospace applications
Li, F., Liu, Y., & Leng, J. (2019) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/ab3d5f · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Nambiar, S., & Yeow, J. T. W.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-10-26
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5717-5726
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2038921677
- Cited by
- 639
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.