Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A View at the Millennium: the Efficiency of Enzymatic Catalysis

Bruice, Thomas C.·2002·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

Binding TS in preference to S and increasing TDeltaS++by freezing out motions in E X S and E X TS have been accepted as the driving forces in enzymatic catalysis; however, the smaller value of DeltaG++ for a one-substrate enzymatic reaction, as compared to its nonenzymatic counterpart, is generally the result of a smaller value of DeltaH++. Ground-state conformers (E X NACs) are formed in enzymatic reactions that structurally resemble E X TS. E X NACs are in thermal equilibrium with all other E X S conformers and are turnstiles through which substrate molecules must pass to arrive at the lowest-energy TS. TS in E X TS may or may not be bound tighter than NAC in E X NAC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ar0001665

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Bruice, T. C.
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2002-01-18
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
139-148
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W2950002563
Cited by
276
References
0
FWCI
13.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A View at the Millennium: the Efficiency of Enzymatic Catalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ar0001665
The paper
Bruice, T. C. (2002). A View at the Millennium: the Efficiency of Enzymatic Catalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar0001665

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.