The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Evolutionary Crystal Structure Prediction Works—and Why
Abstract
Once the crystal structure of a chemical substance is known, many properties can be predicted reliably and routinely. Therefore if researchers could predict the crystal structure of a material before it is synthesized, they could significantly accelerate the discovery of new materials. In addition, the ability to predict crystal structures at arbitrary conditions of pressure and temperature is invaluable for the study of matter at extreme conditions, where experiments are difficult. Crystal structure prediction (CSP), the problem of finding the most stable arrangement of atoms given only the chemical composition, has long remained a major unsolved scientific problem. Two problems are entangled here: search, the efficient exploration of the multidimensional energy landscape, and ranking, the correct calculation of relative energies. For organic crystals, which contain a few molecules in the unit cell, search can be quite simple as long as a researcher does not need to include many possible isomers or conformations of the molecules; therefore ranking becomes the main challenge. For inorganic crystals, quantum mechanical methods often provide correct relative energies, making search the most critical problem. Recent developments provide useful practical methods for solving the search problem to a considerable extent. One can use simulated annealing, metadynamics, random sampling, basin hopping, minima hopping, and data mining. Genetic algorithms have been applied to crystals since 1995, but with limited success, which necessitated the development of a very different evolutionary algorithm. This Account reviews CSP using one of the major techniques, the hybrid evolutionary algorithm USPEX (Universal Structure Predictor: Evolutionary Xtallography). Using recent developments in the theory of energy landscapes, we unravel the reasons evolutionary techniques work for CSP and point out their limitations. We demonstrate that the energy landscapes of chemical systems have an overall shape and explore their intrinsic dimensionalities. Because of the inverse relationships between order and energy and between the dimensionality and diversity of an ensemble of crystal structures, the chances that a random search will find the ground state decrease exponentially with increasing system size. A well-designed evolutionary algorithm allows for much greater computational efficiency. We illustrate the power of evolutionary CSP through applications that examine matter at high pressure, where new, unexpected phenomena take place. Evolutionary CSP has allowed researchers to make unexpected discoveries such as a transparent phase of sodium, a partially ionic form of boron, complex superconducting forms of calcium, a novel superhard allotrope of carbon, polymeric modifications of nitrogen, and a new class of compounds, perhydrides. These methods have also led to the discovery of novel hydride superconductors including the "impossible" LiH(n) (n=2, 6, 8) compounds, and CaLi(2). We discuss extensions of the method to molecular crystals, systems of variable composition, and the targeted optimization of specific physical properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wales, D. J., & Doye, J. P. K. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp970984n · Cited by 3,020
Crystal structure prediction using ab initio evolutionary techniques: Principles and applications
Oganov, A. R., & Glass, C. W. (2006) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2210932 · Cited by 2,596
Hydrogen Dominant Metallic Alloys: High Temperature Superconductors?
Ashcroft, N. W. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.187002 · Cited by 1,329
USPEX—Evolutionary crystal structure prediction
Glass, C. W., Oganov, A. R., & Hansen, N. (2006) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2006.07.020 · Cited by 1,272
Self-citationMolecular Geometry Optimization with a Genetic Algorithm
Deaven, D. M., & Ho, K. M. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.288 · Cited by 1,136
Ionic high-pressure form of elemental boron
Oganov, A. R., Chen, J., Gatti, C., Ma, Y., Ma, Y., Glass, C. W., Liu, Z., Yu, T., Kurakevych, O. O., & Solozhenko, V. L. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07736 · Cited by 951
Self-citationPredicting Crystal Structures: The Parrinello-Rahman Method Revisited
Martoňák, R., Laio, A., & Parrinello, M. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.075503 · Cited by 894
Ma, Y., Eremets, M., Oganov, A. R., Xie, Y., Trojan, I., Medvedev, S., Lyakhov, A. O., Valle, M., & Prakapenka, V. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07786 · Cited by 870
Self-citationGoedecker, S. (2004) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1724816 · Cited by 864
Kubas, G. J., Ryan, R. R., Swanson, B. I., Vergamini, P. J., & Wasserman, H. J. (1984) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00314a049 · Cited by 758
Cited by
Microscopic theory of hardness and design of novel superhard crystals
Tian, Y., Xu, B., & Zhao, Z. (2012) · International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.02.021 · Cited by 1,504
From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science–a review
Schleder, G. R., Padilha, A. C. M., Acosta, C. M., Costa, M., & Fazzio, A. (2019) · Journal of Physics: Materials · doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b · Cited by 852
Structure prediction drives materials discovery
Oganov, A. R., Pickard, C. J., Zhu, Q., & Needs, R. J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0101-8 · Cited by 717
Self-citationA Critical Review of Machine Learning of Energy Materials
Chen, C., Zuo, Y., Ye, W., Li, X., Deng, Z., & Ong, S. P. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201903242 · Cited by 609
A rhombohedral ferroelectric phase in epitaxially strained Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films
Wei, Y., Nukala, P., Salverda, M., Matzen, S., Zhao, H. J., Momand, J., Everhardt, A. S., Agnus, G., Blake, G. R., Lecoeur, P., et al. (2018) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-018-0196-0 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Oganov, A. R., Lyakhov, A. O., & Valle, M.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-03-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 227-237
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2330266625
- Cited by
- 1,240
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 13.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Evolutionary Crystal Structure Prediction Works—and Why. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ar1001318
- The paper
- Oganov, A. R., Lyakhov, A. O., & Valle, M. (2011). How Evolutionary Crystal Structure Prediction Works—and Why. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar1001318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.