The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potential of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separation of Xenon and Krypton
Open accessAbstract
CONSPECTUS: The total world energy demand is predicted to rise significantly over the next few decades, primarily driven by the continuous growth of the developing world. With rapid depletion of nonrenewable traditional fossil fuels, which currently account for almost 86% of the worldwide energy output, the search for viable alternative energy resources is becoming more important from a national security and economic development standpoint. Nuclear energy, an emission-free, high-energy-density source produced by means of controlled nuclear fission, is often considered as a clean, affordable alternative to fossil fuel. However, the successful installation of an efficient and economically viable industrial-scale process to properly sequester and mitigate the nuclear-fission-related, highly radioactive waste (e.g., used nuclear fuel (UNF)) is a prerequisite for any further development of nuclear energy in the near future. Reprocessing of UNF is often considered to be a logical way to minimize the volume of high-level radioactive waste, though the generation of volatile radionuclides during reprocessing raises a significant engineering challenge for its successful implementation. The volatile radionuclides include but are not limited to noble gases (predominately isotopes of Xe and Kr) and must be captured during the process to avoid being released into the environment. Currently, energy-intensive cryogenic distillation is the primary means to capture and separate radioactive noble gas isotopes during UNF reprocessing. A similar cryogenic process is implemented during commercial production of noble gases though removal from air. In light of their high commercial values, particularly in lighting and medical industries, and associated high production costs, alternate approaches for Xe/Kr capture and storage are of contemporary research interest. The proposed pathways for Xe/Kr removal and capture can essentially be divided in two categories: selective absorption by dissolution in solvents and physisorption on porous materials. Physisorption-based separation and adsorption on highly functional porous materials are promising alternatives to the energy-intensive cryogenic distillation process, where the adsorbents are characterized by high surface areas and thus high removal capacities and often can be chemically fine-tuned to enhance the adsorbate-adsorbent interactions for optimum selectivity. Several traditional porous adsorbents such as zeolites and activated carbon have been tested for noble gas capture but have shown low capacity, selectivity, and lack of modularity. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) or porous coordination polymers (PCPs) are an emerging class of solid-state adsorbents that can be tailor-made for applications ranging from gas adsorption and separation to catalysis and sensing. Herein we give a concise summary of the background and development of Xe/Kr separation technologies with a focus on UNF reprocessing and the prospects of MOF-based adsorbents for that particular application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Industrial Gas Handbook: Gas Separation and Purification
Kerry, F. G. (2007) · doi:10.1201/9781420008265 · Cited by 297
Cited by
From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials
Kirchon, A., Feng, L., Drake, H. F., Joseph, E. A., & Zhou, H.-C. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00688a · Cited by 1,448
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separation
Zhao, X., Wang, Y., Li, D., Bu, X., & Feng, P. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201705189 · Cited by 1,305
Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks as a Tunable Platform for Functional Materials
Wang, B., Lin, R.-B., Zhang, Z., Xiang, S., & Chen, B. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c06473 · Cited by 852
Metal–organic framework with optimally selective xenon adsorption and separation
Banerjee, D., Simon, C. M., Plonka, A. M., Motkuri, R. K., Liu, J., Chen, X., Smit, B., Parise, J. B., Haranczyk, M., & Thallapally, P. K. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11831 · Cited by 466
Self-citationRecent advances in guest effects on spin-crossover behavior in Hofmann-type metal-organic frameworks
Ni, Z.-P., Liu, J.-L., Hoque, M. N., Liu, W., Li, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Tong, M.-L. (2017) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2016.12.002 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Banerjee, D., Cairns, A. J., Liu, J., Motkuri, R. K., Nune, S. K., Fernandez, C. A., Krishna, R., Strachan, D. M., & Thallapally, P. K.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-12-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-219
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W1993636798
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.