The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rational Approach to Polymer-Supported Catalysts: Synergy between Catalytic Reaction Mechanism and Polymer Design
Abstract
Supported catalysis is emerging as a cornerstone of transition metal catalysis, as environmental awareness necessitates "green" methodologies and transition metal resources become scarcer and more expensive. Although these supported systems are quite useful, especially in their capacity for transition metal catalyst recycling and recovery, higher activity and selectivity have been elusive compared with nonsupported catalysts. This Account describes recent developments in polymer-supported metal-salen complexes, which often surpass nonsupported analogues in catalytic activity and selectivity, demonstrating the effectiveness of a systematic, logical approach to designing supported catalysts from a detailed understanding of the catalytic reaction mechanism. Over the past few decades, a large number of transition metal complex catalysts have been supported on a variety of materials ranging from polymers to mesoporous silica. In particular, soluble polymer supports are advantageous because of the development of controlled and living polymerization methods that are tolerant to a wide variety of functional groups, including controlled radical polymerizations and ring-opening metathesis polymerization. These methods allow for tuning the density and structure of the catalyst sites along the polymer chain, thereby enabling the development of structure-property relationships between a catalyst and its polymer support. The fine-tuning of the catalyst-support interface, in combination with a detailed understanding of catalytic reaction mechanisms, not only permits the generation of reusable and recyclable polymer-supported catalysts but also facilitates the design and realization of supported catalysts that are significantly more active and selective than their nonsupported counterparts. These superior supported catalysts are accessible through the optimization of four basic variables in their design: (i) polymer backbone rigidity, (ii) the nature of the linker, (iii) catalyst site density, and (iv) the nature of the catalyst attachment. Herein, we describe the design of polymer supports tuned to enhance the catalytic activity or decrease, or even eliminate, decomposition pathways of salen-based transition metal catalysts that follow either a monometallic or a bimetallic reaction mechanism. These findings result in the creation of some of the most active and selective salen catalysts in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Darensbourg, D. J. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068363q · Cited by 1,593
Asymmetric Catalysis of Epoxide Ring-Opening Reactions
Jacobsen, E. N. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar960061v · Cited by 1,261
Cited by
Catalytic Organic Reactions in Water toward Sustainable Society
Kitanosono, T., Masuda, K., Xu, P., & Kobayashi, S. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00417 · Cited by 770
Zaera, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00905 · Cited by 425
Multiple roles of graphene in heterogeneous catalysis
Fan, X., Zhang, G., & Zhang, F. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00094g · Cited by 383
Catalytic Non‐Enzymatic Kinetic Resolution
Pellissier, H. (2011) · Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis · doi:10.1002/adsc.201100111 · Cited by 353
Dendrimers Derived from 1 → 3 Branching Motifs
Newkome, G. R., & Shreiner, C. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900341m · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Madhavan, N., Jones, C. W., & Weck, M.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-09-16
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1153-1165
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2020581309
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.