The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Imaging of Cancer with Copper-64 Radiopharmaceuticals and Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
Open accessAbstract
Molecular imaging has evolved over the past several years into an important tool for diagnosing, understanding, and monitoring disease. Molecular imaging has distinguished itself as an interdisciplinary field, with contributions from chemistry, biology, physics, and medicine. The cross-disciplinary impetus has led to significant achievements, such as the development of more sensitive imaging instruments and robust, safer radiopharmaceuticals, thereby providing more choices to fit personalized medical needs. Molecular imaging is making steadfast progress in the field of cancer research among others. Cancer is a challenging disease, characterized by heterogeneity, uncontrolled cell division, and the ability of cancer cells to invade other tissues. Researchers are addressing these challenges by aggressively identifying and studying key cancer-specific biomarkers such as growth factor receptors, protein kinases, cell adhesion molecules, and proteases, as well as cancer-related biological processes such as hypoxia, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Positron emission tomography (PET) is widely used by clinicians in the United States as a diagnostic molecular imaging tool. Small-animal PET systems that can image rodents and generate reconstructed images in a noninvasive manner (with a resolution as low as 1 mm) have been developed and are used frequently, facilitating radiopharmaceutical development and drug discovery. Currently, [(18)F]-labeled 2-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is the only PET radiotracer used for routine clinical evaluation (primarily for oncological imaging). There is now increasing interest in nontraditional positron-emitting radionuclides, particularly those of the transition metals, for imaging with PET because of increased production and availability. Copper-based radionuclides are currently being extensively evaluated because they offer a varying range of half-lives and positron energies. For example, the half-life (12.7 h) and decay properties (beta(+), 0.653 MeV, 17.8%; beta(-), 0.579 MeV, 38.4 %; the remainder is electron capture) of (64)Cu make it an ideal radioisotope for PET imaging and radiotherapy. In addition, the well-established coordination chemistry of copper allows for its reaction with a wide variety of chelator systems that can potentially be linked to antibodies, proteins, peptides, and other biologically relevant molecules. New chelators with greater in vivo stability, such as the cross-bridged (CB) versions of tetraazamacrocyclic 1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,4,8,11-tetraacetic acid (TETA), are now available. Finally, one of the major aspects of successful imaging is the identification and characterization of a relevant disease biomarker at the cellular and subcellular level and the ensuing development of a highly specific targeting moiety. In this Account, we discuss specific examples of PET imaging with new and improved (64)Cu-based radiopharmaceuticals, highlighting the study of some of the key cancer biomarkers, such as epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR), somatostatin receptors (SSRs), and integrin alpha(v)beta(3).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wadas, T. J., Eiblmaier, M., Zheleznyak, A., Sherman, C. D., Ferdani, R., Liang, K., Achilefu, S., & Anderson, C. J. (2008) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.054502 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Cited by
Compound Copper Chalcogenide Nanocrystals
Coughlan, C., Ibáñez, M., Dobrozhan, O., Singh, A., Cabot, A., & Ryan, K. M. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00376 · Cited by 930
Zhou, M., Zhang, R., Huang, M., Lu, W., Song, S., Melancon, M. P., Tian, M., Liang, D., & Li, C. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja106855m · Cited by 718
New Horizons for Diagnostics and Therapeutic Applications of Graphene and Graphene Oxide
Feng, L., Wu, L., & Qu, X. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201203229 · Cited by 632
Molecular Probes for Autofluorescence-Free Optical Imaging
Jiang, Y., & Pu, K. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00506 · Cited by 426
RGD-Modified Apoferritin Nanoparticles for Efficient Drug Delivery to Tumors
Zhen, Z., Tang, W., Chen, H., Lin, X., Todd, T., Wang, G., Cowger, T., Chen, X., & Xie, J. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn305791q · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Shokeen, M., & Anderson, C. J.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-06-16
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 832-841
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2019099719
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Imaging of Cancer with Copper-64 Radiopharmaceuticals and Positron Emission Tomography (PET). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ar800255q
- The paper
- Shokeen, M., & Anderson, C. J. (2009). Molecular Imaging of Cancer with Copper-64 Radiopharmaceuticals and Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar800255q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.