The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Macromolecular MRI Contrast Agents with Small Dendrimers: Pharmacokinetic Differences between Sizes and Cores
Abstract
Large macromolecular MRI contrast agents with albumin or dendrimer cores are useful for imaging blood vessels. However, their prolonged retention is a major limitation for clinical use. Although smaller dendrimer-based MRI contrast agents are more quickly excreted by the kidneys, they are also able to visualize vascular structures better than Gd-DTPA due to less extravasation. Additionally, unlike Gd-DTPA, they transiently accumulate in renal tubules and thus also can be used to visualize renal structural and functional damage. However, these dendrimer agents are retained in the body for a prolonged time. The purpose of this study was to obtain information from which a macromolecular dendrimer-based MRI contrast agents feasible for use in further clinical studies could be chosen. Six small dendrimer-based MRI contrast agents were synthesized, and their pharmacokinetics, whole-body retention, and dynamic MRI were evaluated in mice to determine an optimal agent in comparison to Gd-[DTPA]-dimeglumine. Diaminobutane (DAB) dendrimer-based agents cleared more rapidly from the body than polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer-based agents with the same numbers of branches. Smaller dendrimer conjugates were more rapidly excreted from the body than the larger dendrimer conjugates. Since PAMAM-G2, DAB-G3, and DAB-G2 dendrimer-based contrast agents showed relatively rapid excretion, these three conjugates might be acceptable for use in further clinical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Longmire, M., Choyke, P. L., & Kobayashi, H. (2008) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.3.5.703 · Cited by 2,149
Self-citationDendrimers in biomedical applications—reflections on the field
SVENSON, S., & TOMALIA, D. (2005) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2005.09.018 · Cited by 1,919
Villaraza, A. J. L., Bumb, A., & Brechbiel, M. W. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900232t · Cited by 632
Self-citationPATRI, A., KUKOWSKALATALLO, J., & BAKERJR, J. (2005) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2005.09.014 · Cited by 597
Dendrimers in biomedical applications—reflections on the field
Svenson, S., & Tomalia, D. A. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.030 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Kobayashi, H., Kawamoto, S., Jo, S.-K., Bryant, H. L., Brechbiel, M. W., & Star, R. A.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-02-20
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 388-394
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W2005718551
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macromolecular MRI Contrast Agents with Small Dendrimers: Pharmacokinetic Differences between Sizes and Cores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bc025633c
- The paper
- Kobayashi, H., Kawamoto, S., Jo, S.-K., Bryant, H. L., Brechbiel, M. W., & Star, R. A. (2003). Macromolecular MRI Contrast Agents with Small Dendrimers: Pharmacokinetic Differences between Sizes and Cores. Bioconjugate Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc025633c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.