The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Redox-Responsive Nanoparticles from the Single Disulfide Bond-Bridged Block Copolymer as Drug Carriers for Overcoming Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Cells
Abstract
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a major impediment to the success of cancer chemotherapy. The intracellular accumulation of drug and the intracellular release of drug molecules from the carrier could be the most important barriers for nanoscale carriers in overcoming MDR. We demonstrated that the redox-responsive micellar nanodrug carrier assembled from the single disulfide bond-bridged block polymer of poly(ε-caprolactone) and poly(ethyl ethylene phosphate) (PCL-SS-PEEP) achieved more drug accumulation and retention in MDR cancer cells. Such drug carrier rapidly released the incorporated doxorubicin (DOX) in response to the intracellular reductive environment. It therefore significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of DOX to MDR cancer cells. It was demonstrated that nanoparticular drug carrier with either poly(ethylene glycol) or poly(ethyl ethylene phosphate) (PEEP) shell increased the influx but decreased the efflux of DOX by the multidrug resistant MCF-7/ADR breast cancer cells, in comparison with the direct incubation of MCF-7/ADR cells with DOX, which led to high cellular retention of DOX. Nevertheless, nanoparticles bearing PEEP shell exhibited higher affinity to the cancer cells. The shell detachment of the PCL-SS-PEEP nanoparticles caused by the reduction of intracellular glutathione significantly accelerated the drug release in MCF-7/ADR cells, demonstrated by the flow cytometric analyses, which was beneficial to the entry of DOX into the nuclei of MCF-7/ADR cells. It therefore enhanced the efficiency in overcoming MDR of cancer cells, which renders the redox-responsive nanoparticles promising in cancer therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Poly(ethylene glycol) in Drug Delivery: Pros and Cons as Well as Potential Alternatives
Knop, K., Hoogenboom, R., Fischer, D., & Schubert, U. S. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200902672 · Cited by 3,533
Cited by
Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery
Mura, S., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3776 · Cited by 6,289
Kamaly, N., Yameen, B., Wu, J., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346 · Cited by 3,070
Nanomedicine in cancer therapy: Challenges, opportunities, and clinical applications
Wicki, A., Witzigmann, D., Balasubramanian, V., & Huwyler, J. (2015) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.030 · Cited by 1,901
Smart micro/nanoparticles in stimulus-responsive drug/gene delivery systems
Karimi, M., Ghasemi, A., Sahandi Zangabad, P., Rahighi, R., Moosavi Basri, S. M., Mirshekari, H., Amiri, M., Shafaei Pishabad, Z., Aslani, A., Bozorgomid, M., et al. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00798d · Cited by 1,519
Fleige, E., Quadir, M. A., & Haag, R. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.020 · Cited by 1,111
Ge, Z., & Liu, S. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60048c · Cited by 914
Magnetic nanoparticle-based therapeutic agents for thermo-chemotherapy treatment of cancer
Hervault, A., & Thanh, N. T. K. (2014) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c4nr03482a · Cited by 585
Stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for drug delivery and cancer therapy
Zhou, Q., Zhang, L., Yang, T., & Wu, H. (2018) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s158696 · Cited by 408
Mimicking the Cell: Bio-Inspired Functions of Supramolecular Assemblies
Tu, Y., Peng, F., Adawy, A., Men, Y., Abdelmohsen, L. K. E. A., & Wilson, D. A. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00344 · Cited by 316
Lee, S.-Y., Tyler, J. Y., Kim, S., Park, K., & Cheng, J.-X. (2013) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp4003333 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y.-C., Wang, F., Sun, T.-M., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-09-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1939-1945
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W2323183774
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.