The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Site-Specific Antibody–Drug Conjugation through Glycoengineering
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been proven clinically to be more effective anti-cancer agents than native antibodies. However, the classical conjugation chemistries to prepare ADCs by targeting primary amines or hinge disulfides have a number of shortcomings including heterogeneous product profiles and linkage instability. We have developed a novel site-specific conjugation method by targeting the native glycosylation site on antibodies as an approach to address these limitations. The native glycans on Asn-297 of antibodies were enzymatically remodeled in vitro using galactosyl and sialyltransferases to introduce terminal sialic acids. Periodate oxidation of these sialic acids yielded aldehyde groups which were subsequently used to conjugate aminooxy functionalized cytotoxic agents via oxime ligation. The process has been successfully demonstrated with three antibodies including trastuzumab and two cytotoxic agents. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography and LC-MS analyses revealed the incorporation of ~1.6 cytotoxic agents per antibody molecule, approximating the number of sialic acid residues. These glyco-conjugated ADCs exhibited target-dependent antiproliferative activity toward antigen-positive tumor cells and significantly greater antitumor efficacy than naked antibody in a Her2-positive tumor xenograft model. These findings suggest that enzymatic remodeling combined with oxime ligation of the native glycans of antibodies offers an attractive approach to generate ADCs with well-defined product profiles. The site-specific conjugation approach presented here provides a viable alternative to other methods, which involve a need to either re-engineer the antibody sequence or develop a highly controlled chemical process to ensure reproducible drug loading.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Immunoglobulin G Resulting from Fc Sialylation
Kaneko, Y., Nimmerjahn, F., & Ravetch, J. V. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1129594 · Cited by 1,754
Engineering the Fc region of immunoglobulin G to modulate in vivo antibody levels
Vaccaro, C., Zhou, J., Ober, R. J., & Ward, E. S. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1143 · Cited by 407
Cited by
Strategies and challenges for the next generation of antibody–drug conjugates
Beck, A., Goetsch, L., Dumontet, C., & Corvaïa, N. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.268 · Cited by 2,271
Antibody–Drug Conjugates: A Comprehensive Review
Khongorzul, P., Ling, C. J., Khan, F. U., Ihsan, A. U., & Zhang, J. (2020) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-19-0582 · Cited by 787
Antibody-drug conjugates: recent advances in conjugation and linker chemistries
Tsuchikama, K., & An, Z. (2018) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-016-0323-0 · Cited by 786
Exploring the next generation of antibody–drug conjugates
Tsuchikama, K., Anami, Y., Ha, S. Y. Y., & Yamazaki, C. M. (2024) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-023-00850-2 · Cited by 659
Agarwal, P., & Bertozzi, C. R. (2015) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc5004982 · Cited by 605
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Q., Stefano, J. E., Manning, C., Kyazike, J., Chen, B., Gianolio, D. A., Park, A., Busch, M., Bird, J., Zheng, X., Simonds-Mannes, H., Kim, J., Gregory, R. C., Miller, R. J., Brondyk, W. H., Dhal, P. K., & Pan, C. Q.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-02-28
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 510-520
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W4249056559
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.