The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinct Uptake Routes of Cell-Penetrating Peptide Conjugates
Abstract
Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are a growing family of peptides that have opened a new avenue in drug delivery, allowing various hydrophilic macromolecules to enter cells. In accordance with most other cationic delivery vectors, CPPs seem to rely mostly on endocytosis for internalization. However, due to conflicting results the exact endocytic pathways for CPP uptake have not yet been resolved. Here, we evaluated the ability of seven CPPs, with different chemical properties, to convey peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) inside cells. Assays based on both splice correction, generating biologically active read-out, and on traditional fluorescence measurements were utilized. The same assays were employed to assess different endocytic pathways and the dependence on extracellular heparan sulfates for internalization. Both highly cationic CPPs (M918, penetratin, and Tat) and amphipathic peptides (transportan, TP10, MAP, and pVEC) were investigated in this study. Conjugate uptake relied on endocytosis for all seven peptides but splice-correcting activity varied greatly for the investigated CPPs. The exact endocytic internalization routes were evaluated through the use of well-known endocytosis inhibitors and tracers. In summary, the different chemical properties of CPPs have little correlation with their ability to efficiently deliver splice-correcting PNA. However, conjugates of polycationic and amphipathic peptides appear to utilize different internalization routes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequence-Selective Recognition of DNA by Strand Displacement with a Thymine-Substituted Polyamide
Nielsen, P. E., Egholm, M., Berg, R. H., & Buchardt, O. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1962210 · Cited by 3,332
Wadia, J. S., Stan, R. V., & Dowdy, S. F. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm996 · Cited by 1,647
Progress in antisense technology
Crooke, S. T. (2004) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.104408 · Cited by 417
Cited by
Cell-Penetrating Peptides: Design, Synthesis, and Applications
Copolovici, D. M., Langel, K., Eriste, E., & Langel, Ü. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4057269 · Cited by 963
Self-citationSecondary structure of cell-penetrating peptides controls membrane interaction and insertion
Eiríksdóttir, E., Konate, K., Langel, Ü., Divita, G., & Deshayes, S. (2010) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.03.005 · Cited by 323
Self-citationMomin, M. Y., Gaddam, R. R., Kravitz, M., Gupta, A., & Vikram, A. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10113097 · Cited by 107
Oh, S. Y., Ju, Y., Kim, S., & Park, H. (2010) · Oligonucleotides · doi:10.1089/oli.2010.0238 · Cited by 33
Pandey, M., Ojha, D., Bansal, S., Rode, A. B., & Chawla, G. (2021) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2021.101003 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Lundin, P., Johansson, H., Guterstam, P., Holm, T., Hansen, M., Langel, Ü., & EL Andaloussi, S.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-11-14
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2535-2542
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W2092726726
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinct Uptake Routes of Cell-Penetrating Peptide Conjugates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bc800212j
- The paper
- Lundin, P., Johansson, H., Guterstam, P., Holm, T., Hansen, M., Langel, Ü., & EL Andaloussi, S. (2008). Distinct Uptake Routes of Cell-Penetrating Peptide Conjugates. Bioconjugate Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc800212j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.