The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physicochemical Stability of the Antibody−Drug Conjugate Trastuzumab-DM1: Changes due to Modification and Conjugation Processes
Abstract
In the manufacture of the antibody-drug conjugate Trastuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1), the lysine residues on the antibody trastuzumab (Tmab) are modified to form the intermediate Tmab-MCC (T-MCC) and then conjugated with the drug DM1. Our goal is to understand the effects of modification and conjugation steps on the physicochemical stability of the antibody. The structural stability of Tmab relative to its modified and conjugated forms was assessed, employing thermally induced stress conditions to formulations containing Tmab, T-MCC, and T-DM1. DSC, SEC, CE-SDS, and LC-MS were used to study the stability of Tmab, T-MCC, and T-DM1 to thermal stress. The DSC thermograms show a decrease in melting temperature for the CH2 transition, in the order Tmab > T-MCC > T-DM1. As per SEC analysis, a significant increase in level of aggregation was detected in T-MCC (∼32%) and T-DM1 (∼5%) after 14 days at 40 °C. Tmab did not show significant aggregate formation. CE-SDS and LC-MS data demonstrate that the aggregation in the case of T-MCC is largely covalent and involves mechanisms other than formation of intermolecular disulfide cross-links. The aggregation observed for T-MCC was significantly inhibited upon addition of amino acids with nucleophilic side chains containing thiol (Cys) and hydroxyl moieties (Ser, Tyr). The covalent aggregation observed for T-MCC and the ability of nucleophilic amino acids, particularly Cys, to inhibit it indicate that the maleimide moiety in the MCC linker may react to form intermolecular covalent cross-links between T-MCC molecules, possibly through a Michael addition mechanism. In addition, DSC results demonstrate that the conjugation of the drug moiety DM1 to Tmab results in destabilization of the CH2 domain of the antibody.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antibody Drug Conjugates: Design and Selection of Linker, Payload and Conjugation Chemistry
McCombs, J. R., & Owen, S. C. (2015) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9710-8 · Cited by 393
Differential scanning calorimetry as a tool for protein folding and stability
Johnson, C. M. (2013) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2012.09.008 · Cited by 388
Antibody–Drug Conjugates (ADCs) for Personalized Treatment of Solid Tumors: A Review
Lambert, J. M., & Morris, C. Q. (2017) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-017-0519-6 · Cited by 304
Glycoconjugates: Synthesis, Functional Studies, and Therapeutic Developments
Shivatare, S. S., Shivatare, V. S., & Wong, C.-H. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01032 · Cited by 257
Aggregation of Protein Therapeutics Enhances Their Immunogenicity: Causes and Mitigation Strategies
Lundahl, M. L. E., Fogli, S., Colavita, P. E., & Scanlan, E. M. (2021) · RSC Chemical Biology · doi:10.1039/d1cb00067e · Cited by 212
Developments and Challenges for mAb-Based Therapeutics
Goswami, S., Wang, W., Arakawa, T., & Ohtake, S. (2013) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib2030452 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Wakankar, A. A., Feeney, M. B., Rivera, J., Chen, Y., Kim, M., Sharma, V. K., & Wang, Y. J.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-08-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1588-1595
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W2044464784
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.