The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hypersensitization of Multidrug Resistant Human Ovarian Carcinoma Cells by Pluronic P85 Block Copolymer
Abstract
The chemosensitizing effect of Pluronic P85 block copolymer were studied using two human ovarian carcinoma sublines: the glycoprotein P (P-gp) multidrug resistant (MDR) SKVLB cells and non-MDR SKOV3 cells. The dramatic increase (up to 700 times) in the daunorubicin cytotoxic activity was observed in the presence of 0.01% (22 microM) to 1% (2.2 mM) copolymer in the case of SKVLB cells. By contrast, the copolymer induced a less than 3-fold increase in the drug activity in SKOV3 cells. As a result, the MDR subline demonstrated much higher response ("hypersensitivity") to the daunorubicin/ Pluronic compared to that of the non-MDR cells. The copolymer increased the cytotoxic effects of other MDR type drugs (doxorubicin, epirubicin, vinblastine, and mitomycin C) by a factor of 20-1000 and non-MDR type drugs (methotrexate and cisplatin) by a factor of 2-5.5. The daunorubicin influx in the cytoplasm and nuclei of SKVLB cells was also increased in the presence of the copolymer, while in SKOV3 cells, it remained practically unchanged. However, the hypersensitization of the MDR cells by the copolymer could not be merely explained by the P-gp modulation. Therefore, the possible role of the copolymer in inhibition of non-P-gp drug resistance is hypothesized, which may also explain the sensitization of MDR cells with respect to non-MDR type drugs as well as sensitization of parental cells. The concentration dependence of the IC50 in MDR cells indicates that just the copolymer unimers are responsible for the hypersensitization effect. The results obtained suggest that Pluronic P85 can be used as a delivery system to enhance the activity of antineoplastic agents against MDR tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabanov, A. V., Chekhonin, V. P., Alakhov, V. Y., Batrakova, E. V., Lebedev, A. S., Melik-Nubarov, N. S., Arzhakov, S. A., Levashov, A. V., Morozov, G. V., Severin, E. S., et al. (1989) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/0014-5793(89)81689-8 · Cited by 296
Self-citation
Cited by
Pluronic® block copolymers as novel polymer therapeutics for drug and gene delivery
Kabanov, A. V., Batrakova, E. V., & Alakhov, V. Y. (2002) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(02)00009-3 · Cited by 1,474
Self-citationNano-engineering block copolymer aggregates for drug delivery
Allen, C., Maysinger, D., & Eisenberg, A. (1999) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/s0927-7765(99)00058-2 · Cited by 1,358
Batrakova, E. V., & Kabanov, A. V. (2008) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.04.013 · Cited by 1,278
Self-citationAmphiphilic block copolymers for drug delivery
Adams, M. L., Lavasanifar, A., & Kwon, G. S. (2003) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.10397 · Cited by 1,078
Advances in polymeric micelles for drug delivery and tumor targeting
Kedar, U., Phutane, P., Shidhaye, S., & Kadam, V. (2010) · Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2010.05.005 · Cited by 791
Metadata
- Authors
- Alakhov, V. Y., Moskaleva, E. Y., Batrakova, E. V., & Kabanov, A. V.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-216
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W2061106944
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.