Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 428

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structure−Activity Relationships of Water-Soluble Cationic Methacrylate/Methacrylamide Polymers for Nonviral Gene Delivery

van de Wetering, Petra, Moret, Ed E., Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek, Nancy M. E., van Steenbergen, Mies J., Hennink, Wim E.·1999·Bioconjugate Chemistry

Abstract

A number of water-soluble cationic carriers was evaluated as transfectant. Almost all studied cationic methacrylate/methacrylamide polymers were able to condense the structure of plasmid DNA, yielding polymer/plasmid complexes (polyplexes) with a size of 0.1-0.3 micron and a slightly positive zeta-potential, which can be taken up by cells, e.g., via endocytosis. However, the transfection efficiency and the cytotoxicity of the polymers differed widely: the highest transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity were observed for poly[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate], p(DMAEMA). Assuming that polyplexes enter cells via endocytosis, p(DMAEMA) apparently has advantageous properties to escape the endosome. A possible explanation is that, due to its average pK(a) value of 7.5, p(DMAEMA) is partially protonated at physiological pH and might behave as a proton sponge. This might cause a disruption of the endosome, which results in the release of both the polyplexes and cytotoxic endosomal/lysosomal enzymes into the cytosol. On the other hand, the analogues of p(DMAEMA) studied here have a higher average pKa value and have, consequently, a higher degree of protonation and a lower buffering capacity. This might be associated with a lower tendency to destabilize the endosome, resulting in both a lower transfection efficiency and a lower cytotoxicity. Furthermore, molecular modeling showed that, of all studied polymers, p(DMAEMA) has the lowest number of interactions with DNA. We therefore hypothesized that the superior transfection efficiency of p(DMAEMA) containing polyplexes can be ascribed to an intrinsic property of p(DMAEMA) to destabilize endosomes combined with an easy dissociation of the polyplex once present in the cytosol and/or the nucleus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bc980148w

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 428

Metadata

Authors
van de Wetering, P., Moret, E. E., Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek, N. M. E., van Steenbergen, M. J., & Hennink, W. E.
Venue
Bioconjugate Chemistry
Published
1999-06-04
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
589-597
ISSN
  • 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4812
OpenAlex
W2070836823
Cited by
428
References
9
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure−Activity Relationships of Water-Soluble Cationic Methacrylate/Methacrylamide Polymers for Nonviral Gene Delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bc980148w
The paper
van de Wetering, P., Moret, E. E., Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek, N. M. E., van Steenbergen, M. J., & Hennink, W. E. (1999). Structure−Activity Relationships of Water-Soluble Cationic Methacrylate/Methacrylamide Polymers for Nonviral Gene Delivery. Bioconjugate Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc980148w

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.