The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structure of the A-Domain of HMG1 and Its Interaction with DNA as Studied by Heteronuclear Three- and Four-Dimensional NMR Spectroscopy
Abstract
HMG1 has two homologous, folded DNA-binding domains ("HMG boxes"), A and B, linked by a short basic region to an acidic C-terminal domain. Like the whole protein, which may perform an architectural role in chromatin, the individual boxes bind to DNA without sequence specificity, have a preference for distorted or prebent DNA, and are able to bend DNA and constrain negative superhelical turns. They show qualitatively similar properties with quantitative differences. We have previously determined the structure of the HMG box from the central B-domain (77 residues) by two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy, which showed that it contains a novel fold [Weir et al. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 1311-1319]. We have now determined the structure of the A-domain (as a Cys-->Ser mutant at position 22 to avoid oxidation, without effect on its DNA-binding properties or structure) using heteronuclear three- and four-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. The A-domain has a very similar global fold to the B-domain and the Drosophila protein HMG-D [Jones et al. (1994) Structure 2, 609-627]. There are small differences between A and B, in particular in the orientation of helix I, where the B-domain is more similar to HMG-D than it is to the A-domain; these differences may turn out to be related to the subtle differences in functional properties between the two domains [Teo et al. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 230, 943-950] and will be the subject of further investigation. NMR studies of the interaction of the A-domain of HMG1 with a short double-stranded oligonucleotide support the notion that the protein binds via the concave face of the L-shaped structure; extensive contacts with the DNA are made by the N-terminal extended strand, the N-terminus of helix I, and the C-terminus of helix II. These contacts are very similar to those seen in the LEF-1 and SRY-DNA complexes [Love et al. (1995) Nature 376, 791-795; Werner et al. (1995) Cell 81, 705-714].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kang, R., Chen, R., Zhang, Q., Hou, W., Wu, S., Cao, L., Huang, J., Yu, Y., Fan, X.-G., Yan, Z., et al. (2014) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2014.05.001 · Cited by 956
The cytokine activity of HMGB1
Yang, H., Wang, H., Czura, C. J., & Tracey, K. J. (2005) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.1104648 · Cited by 545
Analysis of proinflammatory activity of highly purified eukaryotic recombinant HMGB1 (amphoterin)
Rouhiainen, A., Tumova, S., Valmu, L., Kalkkinen, N., & Rauvala, H. (2007) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0306200 · Cited by 214
HMGB1 in Development and Diseases of the Central Nervous System
Fang, P., Schachner, M., & Shen, Y.-Q. (2012) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-012-8264-y · Cited by 193
Love, J. J., Li, X., Chung, J., Dyson, H. J., & Wright, P. E. (2004) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi049591m · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Hardman, C. H., Broadhurst, R. W., Raine, A. R. C., Grasser, K. D., Thomas, J. O., & Laue, E. D.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1995-12-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 16596-16607
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2015565755
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure of the A-Domain of HMG1 and Its Interaction with DNA as Studied by Heteronuclear Three- and Four-Dimensional NMR Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00051a007
- The paper
- Hardman, C. H., Broadhurst, R. W., Raine, A. R. C., Grasser, K. D., Thomas, J. O., & Laue, E. D. (1995). Structure of the A-Domain of HMG1 and Its Interaction with DNA as Studied by Heteronuclear Three- and Four-Dimensional NMR Spectroscopy. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00051a007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.