The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cleavage of DNA with methidiumpropyl-EDTA-iron(II): reaction conditions and product analyses
Abstract
The synthesis of methidiumpropyl-EDTA (MPE) is described. The binding affinities of MPE, MPE.Ni(II), and MPE.Mg(II) to calf thymus DNA are 2.4 X 10(4) M-1, 1.5 X 10(5) M-1, and 1.2 X 10(5) M-1, respectively, in 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.4. The binding site size is two base pairs. MPE.Mg(II) unwinds PM2 DNA 11 +/- 3 degrees per bound molecule. MPE.Fe(II) in the presence of O2 efficiently cleaves DNA and with low sequence specificity. Reducing agents significantly enhance the efficiency of the cleavage reaction in the order sodium ascorbate greater than dithiothreitol greater than NADPH. At concentrations of 0.1-0.01 microM in MPE.Fe(II) and 10 microM in DNA base pairs, optimum ascorbate and dithiothreitol concentrations for DNA cleavage are 1-5 mM. Efficient cleavage of DNA (10 microM in base pairs) with MPE.Fe(II) (0.1-0.01 microM) occurs over a pH range of 7-10 with the optimum at 7.4 (Tris-HCl buffer). The optimum cleavage time is 3.5 h (22 degrees C). DNA cleavage is efficient in a Na+ ion concentration range of 5 mM to 1 M, with the optimum at 5 mM NaCl. The number of single-strand scissions on supercoiled DNA per MPE.Fe(II) under optimum conditions is 1.4. Metals such as Co(II), Mg(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) inhibit strand scission by MPE. The released products from DNA cleavage by MPE.Fe(II) are the four nucleotide bases. The DNA termini at the cleavage site are 5'-phosphate and roughly equal proportions of 3'-phosphate and 3'-(phosphoglycolic acid). The products are consistent with the oxidative degradation of the deoxyribose ring of the DNA backbone, most likely by hydroxy radical.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA by primed synthesis with DNA polymerase
Sanger, F., & Coulson, A. R. (1975) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(75)90213-2 · Cited by 2,709
gamma Ray induced deoxyribonucleic acid strand breaks. 3' Glycolate termini.
Henner, W. D., Rodriguez, L. O., Hecht, S. M., & Haseltine, W. A. (1983) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)33104-1 · Cited by 325
Cited by
DNA damage and oxygen radical toxicity
Imlay, J. A., & Linn, S. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3287616 · Cited by 1,974
Pogozelski, W. K., & Tullius, T. D. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960437i · Cited by 1,018
Oxidative DNA damage through long-range electron transfer
Hall, D. B., Holmlin, R. E., & Barton, J. K. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382731a0 · Cited by 825
Probing the structure of RNAs in solution
Ehresmann, C., Baudin, F., Mougel, M., Romby, P., Ebel, J.-P., & Ehresmann, B. (1987) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/15.22.9109 · Cited by 730
Tullius, T. D., & Dombroski, B. A. (1986) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.83.15.5469 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Hertzberg, R. P., & Dervan, P. B.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1984-08-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3934-3945
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2086817292
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cleavage of DNA with methidiumpropyl-EDTA-iron(II): reaction conditions and product analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00312a022
- The paper
- Hertzberg, R. P., & Dervan, P. B. (1984). Cleavage of DNA with methidiumpropyl-EDTA-iron(II): reaction conditions and product analyses. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00312a022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.