The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative analysis of the effect of Acanthamoeba profilin on actin filament nucleation and elongation
Abstract
The current view of the mechanism of action of Acanthamoeba profilin is that it binds to actin monomers, forming a complex that cannot polymerize [Tobacman, L. S., & Korn, E. D. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 4166-4170; Tseng, P., & Pollard, T. D. (1982) J. Cell Biol. 94, 213-218; Tobacman, L. S., Brenner, S. L., & Korn, E. D. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 8806-8812]. This simple model fails to predict two new experimental observations made with Acanthamoeba actin in 50 mM KC1, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EGTA. First, Acanthamoeba profilin inhibits elongation of actin filaments far more at the pointed end than at the barbed end. According, to the simple model, the Kd for the profilin-actin complex is less than 5 microM on the basis of observations at the pointed end and greater than 50 microM for the barbed end. Second, profilin inhibits nucleation more strongly than elongation. According to the simple model, the Kd for the profilin-actin complex is 60-140 microM on the basis of two assays of elongation but 2-10 microM on the basis of polymerization kinetics that reflect nucleation. These new findings can be explained by a new and more complex model for the mechanism of action that is related to a proposal of Tilney and co-workers [Tilney, L. G., Bonder, E. M., Coluccio, L. M., & Mooseker, M. S. (1983) J. Cell Biol. 97, 113-124]. In this model, profilin can bind both to actin monomers with a Kd of about 5 microM and to the barbed end of actin filaments with a Kd of about 50-100 microM. An actin monomer bound to profilin cannot participate in nucleation or add to the pointed end of an actin filament. It can add to the barbed end of a filament. When profilin is bound to the barbed end of a filament, actin monomers cannot bind to that end, but the terminal actin protomer can dissociate at the usual rate. This model includes two different Kd's--one for profilin bound to actin monomers and one for profilin bound to an actin molecule at the barbed end of a filament. The affinity for the end of the filament is lower by a factor of 10 than the affinity for the monomer, presumably due to the difference in the conformation of the two forms of actin or to steric constraints at the end of the filament.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blanchoin, L., Amann, K. J., Higgs, H. N., Marchand, J.-B., Kaiser, D. A., & Pollard, T. D. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35010008 · Cited by 586
Self-citationInteraction of WASP/Scar proteins with actin and vertebrate Arp2/3 complex
Marchand, J.-B., Kaiser, D. A., Pollard, T. D., & Higgs, H. N. (2001) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35050590 · Cited by 331
Self-citationThe Arp1/11 minifilament of dynactin primes the endosomal Arp2/3 complex
Fokin, A. I., David, V., Oguievetskaia, K., Derivery, E., Stone, C. E., Cao, L., Rocques, N., Molinie, N., Henriot, V., Aumont-Nicaise, M., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd5956 · Cited by 37
The Sharpin interactome reveals a role for Sharpin in lamellipodium formation via the Arp2/3 complex
Khan, M. H., Salomaa, S. I., Jacquemet, G., Butt, U., Miihkinen, M., Deguchi, T., Kremneva, E., Lappalainen, P., Humphries, M. J., & Pouwels, J. (2017) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.200329 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollard, T. D., & Cooper, J. A.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1984-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 6631-6641
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2011017251
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.