The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and x-ray-derived accessible sites
Abstract
A new set of hydrophilicity high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) parameters is presented. These parameters were derived from the retention times of 20 model synthetic peptides, Ac-Gly-X-X-(Leu)3-(Lys)2-amide, where X was substituted with the 20 amino acids found in proteins. Since hydrophilicity parameters have been used extensively in algorithms to predict which amino acid residues are antigenic, we have compared the profiles generated by our new set of hydrophilic HPLC parameters on the same scale as nine other sets of parameters. Generally, it was found that the HPLC parameters obtained in this study correlated best with antigenicity. In addition, it was shown that a combination of the three best parameters for predicting antigenicity further improved the predictions. These predicted surface sites or, in other words, the hydrophilic, accessible, or mobile regions were then correlated to the known antigenic sites from immunological studies and accessible sites determined by X-ray crystallographic data for several proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reliable B cell epitope predictions: impacts of method development and improved benchmarking
Kringelum, J. V., Lundegaard, C., Lund, O., & Nielsen, M. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002829 · Cited by 697
Age-Dependent Diarrhea Induced by a Rotaviral Nonstructural Glycoprotein
Ball, J. M., Tian, P., Zeng, C. Q.-Y., Morris, A. P., & Estes, M. K. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5258.101 · Cited by 688
Makhatadze, G. I., & Privalov, P. L. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80197-4 · Cited by 522
An Introduction to B-Cell Epitope Mapping and In Silico Epitope Prediction
Potocnakova, L., Bhide, M., & Pulzova, L. B. (2016) · Journal of Immunology Research · doi:10.1155/2016/6760830 · Cited by 367
Greenbaum, J. A., Andersen, P. H., Blythe, M., Bui, H., Cachau, R. E., Crowe, J., Davies, M., Kolaskar, A. S., Lund, O., Morrison, S., et al. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.815 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, J. M. R., Guo, D., & Hodges, R. S.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1986-09-23
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 5425-5432
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W1993568862
- Cited by
- 1,185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and x-ray-derived accessible sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00367a013
- The paper
- Parker, J. M. R., Guo, D., & Hodges, R. S. (1986). New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and x-ray-derived accessible sites. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00367a013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
