The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cleavage of DNA in nuclei and chromatin with staphylococcal nuclease
Abstract
Treatment of either rat liver chromatin or intact nuclei with the enzyme staphylococcal nuclease results in the conversion of about half of the DNA to acid-soluble oligonucleotides. As previously described, mild digestion of nuclei results in the liberation of a series of nucleoprotein particles containing DNA fragments which are all integral multiples of a unit length DNA 185 base pairs in length. Analysis of the kinetics of appearance of these fragments suggests that at least 85% of the nuclear DNA is involved in the formation of the repeating subunit profile. More extensive digestion of nuclei however results in the generation of a series of eight unique DNA fragments containing 160 to 50 base pairs. The series of smaller molecular weight DNA is virtually identical with the profile obtained upon limit digestion of isolated chromatin. By velocity centrifugation we have obtained highly purified preparations of the monomeric nucleoprotein particle. Digestion of this monomeric subunit results in the solubilization of 46% of the DNA and analysis of the resistant DNA again reveals the set of eight lower molecular weight fragments. These data suggest that the initial site of nuclease cleavage in chromatin resides within the DNA bridging the repeating monomeric subunits. Further attack results in cleavage at a set of sites within the monomer liberating a pattern of smaller DNA fragments which probably represents the points of intimate contact between the histones and DNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Selective digestion of transcriptionally active ovalbumin genes from oviduct nuclei.
Garel, A., & Axel, R. (1976) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.73.11.3966 · Cited by 512
Self-citationChromatin accessibility: a window into the genome
Tsompana, M., & Buck, M. J. (2014) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/1756-8935-7-33 · Cited by 447
Iwafuchi-Doi, M., Donahue, G., Kakumanu, A., Watts, J. A., Mahony, S., Pugh, B. F., Lee, D., Kaestner, K. H., & Zaret, K. S. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.001 · Cited by 390
Lutter, L. C. (1978) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(78)90306-6 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Axel, R.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1975-07-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2921-2925
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W1968474740
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cleavage of DNA in nuclei and chromatin with staphylococcal nuclease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00684a020
- The paper
- Axel, R. (1975). Cleavage of DNA in nuclei and chromatin with staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00684a020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.