The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crystal Structure of a Four-Copper Laccase Complexed with an Arylamine: Insights into Substrate Recognition and Correlation with Kinetics,
Open accessAbstract
Laccases are multicopper oxidases that catalyze the oxidation of a wide range of phenols or arylamines, and their use in industrial oxidative processes is increasing. We purified from the white rot fungus Trametes versicolor a laccase that exists as five different isozymes, depending on glycosylation. The 2.4 A resolution structure of the most abundant isozyme of the glycosylated enzyme was solved. The four copper atoms are present, and it is the first crystal structure of a laccase in its active form. The crystallized enzyme binds 2,5-xylidine, which was used as a laccase inducer in the fungus culture. This arylamine is a very weak reducing substrate of the enzyme. The cavity enclosing 2,5-xylidine is rather wide, allowing the accommodation of substrates of various sizes. Several amino acid residues make hydrophobic interactions with the aromatic ring of the ligand. In addition, two charged or polar residues interact with its amino group. The first one is an histidine that also coordinates the copper that functions as the primary electron acceptor. The second is an aspartate conserved among fungal laccases. The purified enzyme can oxidize various hydroxylated compounds of the phenylurea family of herbicides that we synthesized. These phenolic substrates have better affinities at pH 5 than at pH 3, which could be related to the 2,5-xylidine binding by the aspartate. This is the first high-resolution structure of a multicopper oxidase complexed to a reducing substrate. It provides a model for engineering laccases that are either more efficient or with a wider substrate specificity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multicopper oxidases and oxygenases
Solomon, E. I., Sundaram, U. M., & Machonkin, T. E. (1996) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr950046o · Cited by 3,664
Cited by
Copper Active Sites in Biology
Solomon, E. I., Heppner, D. E., Johnston, E. M., Ginsbach, J. W., Cirera, J., Qayyum, M., Kieber-Emmons, M. T., Kjaergaard, C. H., Hadt, R. G., & Tian, L. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400327t · Cited by 1,751
Reactivity of Dioxygen−Copper Systems
Lewis, E. A., & Tolman, W. B. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020633r · Cited by 1,294
Pathways for degradation of lignin in bacteria and fungi
Bugg, T. D. H., Ahmad, M., Hardiman, E. M., & Rahmanpour, R. (2011) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/c1np00042j · Cited by 1,018
Laccases: a never-ending story
Giardina, P., Faraco, V., Pezzella, C., Piscitelli, A., Vanhulle, S., & Sannia, G. (2010) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-009-0169-1 · Cited by 1,007
Enzymes as Working or Inspirational Electrocatalysts for Fuel Cells and Electrolysis
Cracknell, J. A., Vincent, K. A., & Armstrong, F. A. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0680639 · Cited by 988
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertrand, T., Jolivalt, C., Briozzo, P., Caminade, E., Joly, N., Madzak, C., & Mougin, C.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-05-14
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 7325-7333
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2049925893
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.