The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Hydantoin Lesions Formed from Oxidation of 7,8-Dihydro-8-oxoguanine Are Potent Sources of Replication Errors in Vivo
Abstract
Single-stranded DNA genomes have been constructed that site-specifically contain the 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanine (8-oxoG) oxidation products guanidinohydantoin (Gh) and the two stable stereoisomers of spiroiminodihydantoin (Sp1 and Sp2). The circular viral genomes were transfected into wild-type AB1157 Escherichia coli, and the efficiency of lesion bypass by DNA polymerase(s) was assessed. Viral progeny were analyzed for mutation frequency and type using the recently developed restriction endonuclease and postlabeling (REAP) assay. Gh was bypassed nearly as efficiently as the parent 8-oxoG but was highly mutagenic, causing almost exclusive G --> C transversions. The stereoisomers Sp1 and Sp2 were, in comparison, much stronger blocks to DNA polymerase extension and caused a mixture of G --> T and G --> C transversions. The ratio of G --> T to G --> C mutations for each Sp lesion was dependent on the stereochemical configuration of the base. All observed mutation frequencies were at least an order of magnitude higher than those caused by 8-oxoG. Were these lesions to be formed in vivo, our data show that they are absolutely miscoding and may be refractory to repair after translesion synthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Steenken, S., & Jovanovic, S. V. (1997) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja962255b · Cited by 1,450
Error-Prone Repair DNA Polymerases in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Goodman, M. F. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.083101.124707 · Cited by 727
Mutagenicity and repair of oxidative DNA damage: insights from studies using defined lesions
Wang, D., Kreutzer, D. A., & Essigmann, J. M. (1998) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(98)00066-9 · Cited by 464
Self-citation
Cited by
Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage
David, S. S., O'Shea, V. L., & Kundu, S. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05978 · Cited by 1,238
Oxidative damage to DNA: formation, measurement and biochemical features
Cadet, J., Douki, T., Gasparutto, D., & Ravanat, J.-L. (2003) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.09.001 · Cited by 697
Gates, K. S. (2009) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx900242k · Cited by 484
Targeted and Persistent 8-Oxoguanine Base Damage at Telomeres Promotes Telomere Loss and Crisis
Fouquerel, E., Barnes, R. P., Uttam, S., Watkins, S. C., Bruchez, M. P., & Opresko, P. L. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.024 · Cited by 275
Mitochondrial DNA damage and its consequences for mitochondrial gene expression
Cline, S. D. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.06.002 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, P. T., Delaney, J. C., Muller, J. G., Neeley, W. L., Tannenbaum, S. R., Burrows, C. J., & Essigmann, J. M.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-07-18
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 9257-9262
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W1998808749
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.