The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pathway for Polyarginine Entry into Mammalian Cells
Open accessAbstract
Cationic peptides known as protein transduction domains (PTDs) provide a means to deliver molecules into mammalian cells. Here, nonaarginine (R(9)), the most efficacious of known PTDs, is used to elucidate the pathway for PTD internalization. Although R(9) is found in the cytosol as well as the nucleolus when cells are fixed, this peptide is observed only in the endocytic vesicles of live cells. Colocalization studies with vesicular markers confirm that PTDs are internalized by endocytosis rather than by crossing the plasma membrane. The inability of R(9) to enter living cells deficient in heparan sulfate (HS) suggests that binding to HS is necessary for PTD internalization. This finding is consistent with the high affinity of R(9) for heparin (K(d) = 109 nM). Finally, R(9) is shown to promote the leakage of liposomes but only at high peptide:lipid ratios. These and other data indicate that the PTD-mediated delivery of molecules into live mammalian cells involves (1) binding to cell surface HS, (2) uptake by endocytosis, (3) release upon HS degradation, and (4) leakage from endocytic vesicles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nakase, I., Hirose, H., Tanaka, G., Tadokoro, A., Kobayashi, S., Takeuchi, T., & Futaki, S. (2009) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2009.192 · Cited by 118
Drug Targeting Strategies Based on Charge Dependent Uptake of Nanoparticles into Cancer Cells
Saadat, M., Zahednezhad, F., Zakeri-Milani, P., Reza Heidari, H., Shahbazi-Mojarrad, J., & Valizadeh, H. (2019) · Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.18433/jpps30318 · Cited by 88
Elson-Schwab, L., Garner, O. B., Schuksz, M., Crawford, B. E., Esko, J. D., & Tor, Y. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m700463200 · Cited by 68
Cariveau, M. J., Tang, X., Cui, X.-L., & Xu, B. (2007) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.107.036681 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuchs, S. M., & Raines, R. T.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-02-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2438-2444
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2077886045
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.